Reynolds number for case flow over airfoil

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Reynolds number in relation to laminar and turbulent flow over airfoils, specifically addressing the conditions under which these flow regimes occur. Participants explore the complexities of determining transition points and the influence of various factors on flow characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the range of Reynolds numbers for laminar flow over airfoils, suggesting Re < 5 x 10^5 as a possible threshold.
  • Another participant argues that there is no general transition point for Reynolds numbers, noting that it varies based on the airfoil shape, surface roughness, and flow quality, with typical transition Reynolds numbers potentially reaching into the millions.
  • A participant mentions that Reynolds numbers for internal flows are easier to handle and specifies their airfoil as a NACA 0012 symmetrical airfoil currently being analyzed through CFD simulation.
  • Another participant counters that internal flow is fundamentally different from external flow, emphasizing the challenges in determining transition Reynolds numbers even for simple geometries like a flat plate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and determination of transition Reynolds numbers, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific airfoil characteristics, flow conditions, and the complexity of transition phenomena, which are not universally applicable across different scenarios.

maomao39
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
In which range of Reynolds numeber is laminar flow for airfoil?
Is it Re < 5 x 10^5?
How about turbulence case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no general transition point Retnolds number. It depends on the shape of te airfoil and the surface roughness of the airfoil and the freestream flow quality and a host of other things besides Reynolds number. Typically though, even in a noisy wind tunnel the transition Retnolds number will be well into the millions. Still, that is very much an overgeneralization.
 
The reynolds number for internal flow are much more easier.
My airfoil is NACA 0012 symmetrical airofoil.
Currently running on CFD simulation
 
Yes but internal flow is fundamentally different. Even on a simple flat plate there is no way to determine the transition Reynolds number in general.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
532
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
34K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K