Riemann Tensor, Stoke's Theorem & Winding Number

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the Riemann tensor, Stokes' theorem, and the concept of winding numbers in the context of parallel transport along closed curves, particularly in relation to closed timelike curves (CTCs). Participants explore the implications of these concepts on the multivalued nature of the Riemann tensor and the behavior of vectors under parallel transport.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the Riemann tensor can be derived using Stokes' theorem and parallel transport along closed curves.
  • There is a suggestion that incorporating winding numbers could imply that the Riemann tensor is multivalued.
  • One participant argues against the idea of multivaluedness, stating that winding around a closed curve multiple times represents a different closed curve.
  • Questions arise regarding the behavior of vectors when parallel transported along closed timelike curves, specifically whether they return to their original state.
  • Another participant suggests that if a vector does return to its original state, it implies no curvature, while if it does not, it suggests multivaluedness.
  • A later reply clarifies that parallel transporting a vector around a circuit yields different vectors, which are not part of the original vector field, and emphasizes that curvature is defined through circuits returning to the starting event exactly once.
  • It is noted that closed timelike curves do not have special significance in defining curvature, as both spacelike and timelike circuits are considered.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of winding numbers and the behavior of vectors under parallel transport, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of vectors in spacetime and the definitions of curvature, which may not be universally agreed upon. The implications of closed timelike curves on curvature and vector behavior are also not settled.

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
I saw briefly that the Riemann tensor can be obtained via Stoke's theorem and parallel transport along a closed curve.

If one does add winding number then it can give several results, does it imply that this tensor is multivalued ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk22 said:
I saw briefly

Where? Please give a reference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
jk22 said:
I saw briefly that the Riemann tensor can be obtained via Stoke's theorem and parallel transport along a closed curve.

If one does add winding number then it can give several results, does it imply that this tensor is multivalued ?
No, because winding around a closed curve several times is a different closed curve.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jk22
Then how is the coming back at the same time as starting, it should but start again or time were stopped ?

Namely if a vector is parallel transported along a CTC is it coming back to its original state ?

I think I'm locked since the two alternatives are for me : If it is yes then there is no curvature, if it is no then the vector at ##(x^\mu)## has several values, hence multivalued ?

What am I thinking wrong here ?
 
jk22 said:
if a vector is parallel transported along a CTC

Where did CTCs come into it?
 
jk22 said:
Then how is the coming back at the same time as starting, it should but start again or time were stopped ?

Namely if a vector is parallel transported along a CTC is it coming back to its original state ?

I think I'm locked since the two alternatives are for me : If it is yes then there is no curvature, if it is no then the vector at ##(x^\mu)## has several values, hence multivalued ?

What am I thinking wrong here ?
I am going to guess what might be confusing you (always dangerous, but I'll risk it). I'm thinking you have in mind a vector field with a value at every spacetime point (event). You take one of these and parallel transport around a circuit. You get a different vector. Around a circuit again, you get still a different vector. But each of these transported vectors is a different vector than the original, not part of the original vector field at all. There is no multi-valued anything. Curvature is defined via a limiting operation for circuits that return to the starting event exactly once. Note, CTC's are not special at all, in this. In defining curvature at a point, you will consider spacelike circuits and timelike circuits, even mixed. It doesn't matter for defining curvature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K