Ring Impedance & String Connection: Is It Valid?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the validity of treating the ring's impedance as a coefficient b and its relationship with the second string's impedance Z2. The derived equation suggests that the first string's impedance Z1 equals b plus Z2, leading to the conclusion that b can be equated with impedance. However, concerns are raised about the need for a constant multiplier to compare b with impedance and the implications of friction at the ring affecting overall impedance. The complexity of the problem is acknowledged, with suggestions to analyze it through motion and wave equations rather than simplifying it to impedance equations, particularly noting that reflections may occur if the second string's impedance is higher than the first.
gasgas
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Suppose there are two strings with equal tension but different impedances attached to a ring on a vertical rod. If we shake the first string, it will make the ring slide and transmit the wave to the other string. As the ring slides on the rod, there is friction acting on it which is equal to F=b*v where b is coefficient of friction and v the speed of the ring. What is the value of b if there is no wave reflection?
Relevant Equations
F=Z*V
R=(Z1-Z2)/(Z1+Z2)
If we consider the coefficient b as the rings impedance, we can consider the effective impedance on the right to be b+Z2 where Z2 is the impedance of the second string. Then because there is no reflection it follows that Z1=b+Z2 or b=Z1-Z2.
Is this a valid solution? My professor went through a more complicated derivation which we concluded was wrong so I tried this. Is it correct? Can we suppose that the ring and string are connected in series and can we equate b with impedance? They match dimensionally so i don't see why not. Any help appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My doubt would be whether there may be a constant multiplier needed to convert b to a comparable impedance. I see no way other than to analyse the motion fully.
 
I agree with @haruspex that this is a complicated problem, and I'd be inclined to analyze it fully from a motion and wave equation standpoint, instead of trying to simplify it to the impedance/reflection equation. Perhaps there is a simpler way to do it, but I'm not seeing it intuitively.

Also, it doesn't look like it's specified in the problem statement, but it seems clear to me that this can only work if the impedance of the 2nd string is lower than the first. The friction at the ring would seem to add impedance, so if the 2nd string had higher impedance than the first, I don't think there is any way to avoid reflections at the ring junction.

I also don't understand this part of the problem statement, about the frictional force depending on the velocity. That's not normally how frictional forces work, but maybe it helps with the math somehow...
gasgas said:
As the ring slides on the rod, there is friction acting on it which is equal to F=b*v where b is coefficient of friction and v the speed of the ring.
 
berkeman said:
maybe it helps with the math somehow.
It will. With b negative, it arranges that the frictional force always opposes the motion.
 
But speed dependent?
 
berkeman said:
But speed dependent?
That's the price of making the math more manageable.
Bear in mind that standard damped oscillation analysis assumes F∝v.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top