Ring theory- zero divisors and integral domains

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the ring Z/mZ and the set S = {[0], [a], [2a], · · ·, [m − a]}, with the goal of demonstrating that S forms a subring under addition and multiplication when a divides m. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the closure of S under these operations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to substitute m with ab, where a divides m, and questions the closure of S under addition and multiplication. Another participant suggests checking closure under addition by evaluating the sum of two general elements from S.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the closure properties of S, indicating that the addition of two elements from S results in a multiple of a, which remains within S. There is a recognition of a similar argument for multiplication, but the discussion does not reach a consensus on the overall proof.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is seeking hints rather than complete solutions, indicating a focus on understanding the properties of the set S in relation to the ring structure.

porroadventum
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the ring Z/mZ, show that S = {[0], [a], [2a], · · · , [m − a]} forms a (possibly
nonunitary) subring of Z/mZ when a divides m. (i.e. show that (S,+, ·) is closed
the usual addition and multiplication. (We are not require to find a multiplicative identity).



The Attempt at a Solution



Since a divides m then m=ab so I tried subbing in ab for m and got [m-a]=[ab-a]=[a(1-b)]... but not too sure where to go from here. From looking at the set S it does not seem to be closed under addition or multiplication? Just a hint at how to go about/start/ approach this question would much appreciated! THank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, let's check closure under addition. Two general elements of ##S## look like ##[ra]## and ##[sa]##, where ##r## and ##s## are integers. So what is ##[ra] + [sa]##? Evaluate it in the ring ##\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}##, and see if the answer is in ##S##.
 
OK, I see how to prove it now- the addition of two elements of S will always give a number which is a multiple of a, therefore will be an element of S. (Similarly for multiplication)...?

(Thank you)
 
Yes, similarly for multiplication.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K