Rings- units, nilpotents, idempotents

  • Thread starter Thread starter missavvy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings Units
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves identifying the units, nilpotents, and idempotents in a specific ring represented by a matrix structure with real number entries. The matrix has real numbers in the first row and the diagonal of the second row, with a zero in the lower left position.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the ring, questioning whether it consists of all real numbers or specific matrices with real entries. There is an exploration of the conditions under which elements are considered units, particularly focusing on the invertibility of matrices based on their determinants.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify the structure of the ring and the implications for identifying units. Some guidance has been provided regarding the invertibility of matrices and the necessity for the inverse to also belong to the ring.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the matrix entries and whether they represent arbitrary real numbers or specific values. The participants are also navigating the definitions of units, nilpotents, and idempotents within the context of matrix rings.

missavvy
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the units, nilpotents and idempotents for the ring R =
[\Re \Re]
[0 \Re]

(Those fancy R's are suppose to be the set of Reals by the way.. not good with this typing math stuff)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not actually sure I understand the ring itself. So it is a matrix with entries \Re in the 1-1, 1-2, 2-2 positions and 0 in the 2-1 position..
So is it the entire set of the real numbers?? :S

Anyways for the units, I said all elements are units except for when \Re=0.

But then again I wasn't sure if I'm suppose to use the entire set as those positions, or is it just random numbers from the reals? like a,b,c. OR is it just any number from the reals, but each position has the same #, say x belonging to the reals?

Eughh.. just clarification on the actual question I guess is what I need some help with.

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's got to be just all matrices [[a,b],[0,c]] where a, b, and c are real numbers. It's your 'random numbers from the reals' theory. Where can you go from there?
 
ok well for the units I'm attempting to solve some systems of equations..
[[a,b],[0,c]]*[[a',b'],[d',c']] = [[1,0],[0,1]]
and
[[a',b'],[d',c']]*[[a,b],[0,c]] = [[1,0],[0,1]]

but for matrices, isn't everything invertible whose det is not 0?
 
missavvy said:
ok well for the units I'm attempting to solve some systems of equations..
[[a,b],[0,c]]*[[a',b'],[d',c']] = [[1,0],[0,1]]
and
[[a',b'],[d',c']]*[[a,b],[0,c]] = [[1,0],[0,1]]

but for matrices, isn't everything invertible whose det is not 0?

Sure, if det is nonzero then the matrix is invertible. All you have to show is that the inverse is also in the ring.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K