River-boat problem (Relative velocity)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The river-boat problem involves a man crossing a 120 m wide river using a motorboat with a rowing speed of 3 m/s against a current of 4 m/s. To reach the point directly opposite his starting position in the shortest time, he must account for drift and walking speed of 1 m/s. The optimal angle θ for rowing is determined to be sin-1(3/5), resulting in a total crossing time of 160 seconds. The solution requires minimizing the total time as a function of the angle, incorporating both rowing and walking components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relative velocity concepts
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their applications
  • Familiarity with optimization techniques in calculus
  • Basic principles of motion in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of trigonometric functions in physics problems
  • Learn about optimization techniques in calculus, specifically for minimizing functions
  • Explore relative velocity problems in different contexts, such as air or water currents
  • Investigate the implications of drift in navigation and movement across flowing bodies
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly in mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in solving optimization problems involving relative motion and drift.

baldbrain
Messages
236
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement


A man wishes to cross a river of width 120 m by a motorboat. His rowing speed in still water (or relative to water) is 3 m/s and his maximum walking speed is 1 m/s. The river flows with a velocity of 4 m/s.
(a) Find the path which he should take to reach the point directly opposite to his starting point in the shortest time.
(b) Find the time required to reach the destination.
IMG_20180804_131152.JPG

2. Homework Equations

Let ω be the width of the river and x be the drifting of the boat.
Let v denote the velocity vectors and v denote their respective magnitudes.
vr = absolute velocity of river
vbr = velocity of boatman relative to the river or velocity of boatman in still water
vb = absolute velocity of boatman
Hence, vbr = vb - vr
vb = vbr + vr
Time taken to cross the river t = ω/vbr-y = ω/vbrcos θ
Drift x = vb-xt = (vr - vbrsin θ)ω/vbrcos θ

The Attempt at a Solution


Now, in order to reach the point directly opposite to his starting point, resultant velocity vb must be perpendicular to the river current.
So, for this the drift x must be 0.
x = 0 gives vr = vbrsin θ
Subsituting, sin θ = 4/3, which is meaningless.
I can't proceed without θ. Also, I don't get why they've given his maximum walking speed.
Am I missing anything?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180804_131152.JPG
    IMG_20180804_131152.JPG
    32.3 KB · Views: 4,110
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are missing that a 3 m/s velocity cannot have a 4 m/s component so regardless of how he rows he will have to walk back on the other side. This is why you are given the walking speed. The angle ##\theta## is a parameter and you will obtain different results for different angles. You are asked to find the shortest time possible so you need to minimise the time as a fuction of the angle.
 
So, t = 120/3cos θ = 40/cos θ
x = (4 - 3sin θ)40 sec θ = 160sec θ - 120tan θ
But I can't just differentiate t = 40sec θ. That wouldn't render anything...
 
Please define your variables properly. If not you are just assuming we know what you are doing, but we will only be guessing. In particular, what is your definition of the time t and what is its relation to your sought time?
 
Orodruin said:
Please define your variables properly. If not you are just assuming we know what you are doing, but we will only be guessing. In particular, what is your definition of the time t and what is its relation to your sought time?
Of course, it's the time taken to cross the river. We must find the shortest time possible, which, as you said, must be minimised as a function of the angle.
But I still don't get how to apply the walking speed and what to do with the drift equation.
 
I have the drift of the boat as a function of the angle.
 
baldbrain said:
Of course, it's the time taken to cross the river. We must find the shortest time possible, which, as you said, must be minimised as a function of the angle.
We are not asked to minimize the time taken to cross the river. We are asked to minimize the time taken to reach a point opposite the starting point.

Since the boat is guaranteed to drift downstream as it is rowed across the river, the man must either walk the boat upstream before launching or after landing on the opposite bank. How far he has to walk it will depend on the angle at which he rows.
 
jbriggs444 said:
How far he has to walk it will depend on the angle at which he rows.
So we take x to be the drift of the man and then find the time (of course as a function of the angle)?
That means time of walking t| = x/vwalking
∴ t| = (160sec θ - 120tan θ)/1
total time = t + t| = 200sec θ - 120tan θ
And, then you minimize it? Does that sound right?
 
baldbrain said:
So we take x to be the drift of the man and then find the time (of course as a function of the angle)?
That means time of walking t| = x/vwalking
∴ t| = (160sec θ - 120tan θ)/1
total time = t + t| = 200sec θ - 120tan θ
And, then you minimize it? Does that sound right?
WIthout having carefully gone over the arithmetic, yes, that sounds right.

It has the right qualitative feel. It has the 200 sec θ which embodies the elapsed time crossing the river plus the extra time needed to compensate for downstream drift. It has the -120 tan θ which embodies the limited advantage one can get by aiming upstream to reduce the drift velocity.
 
  • #10
jbriggs444 said:
WIthout having carefully gone over the arithmetic, yes, that sounds right.

It has the right qualitative feel. It has the 200 sec θ which embodies the elapsed time crossing the river plus the extra time needed to compensate for downstream drift. It has the -120 tan θ which embodies the limited advantage one can get by aiming upstream to reduce the drift velocity.
That would yield θ = sin-1 (3/5) and t = 160 s.
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K