RL Circuit Initial Current Simplification

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the initial current in an RL circuit and the relationship between currents I2 and I3. The formula I2 = (V/(R3 + R2))e^(-t/τ) is questioned, particularly regarding its initial condition, which is incorrectly assumed to be I2(0) = V/(R3 + R2). Participants clarify that I3, defined as the current through the inductor, cannot change instantaneously, while I2 can. The need for a clear definition of I3 is emphasized, as it is not always equal to I2, particularly before the switch is reopened. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately defining current directions and initial conditions in circuit analysis.
  • #51
annamal said:
Yes I2 = -I3...wondering if you could help me solve the problem from here...
I thought we were. If you are asking us to solve it for you, then probably not. The point isn't to get the answer, it's to learn how to get the answer the next time. What is it that you don't understand about your own work on this problem?
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Let's back up a bit and deal with some basics first. Do you know 1st year calculus? Is there anything about these (equivalent) inductor equations that you find confusing?

$$ v(t) = L⋅ \frac{di(t)}{dt} \Leftrightarrow i(t) = \frac{1}{L} \int_0^t v(\tau) \, d\tau + i(0) $$
 
  • #53
Maybe try to simplify the problem as shown below. Reopen the switch after the circuit has settled down, is it possible that the initial current of the inductor is ##~\frac{E}{R1+R_2}=\frac{1}{1+1}=0.5A ## ? :cry:

A11.jpg
 
Back
Top