RMS Current through RLC combination ciruit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the RMS current through a resistor in an RLC circuit, specifically addressing the implications of using an AC voltage source versus a battery. Participants are exploring concepts related to impedance in AC circuits, particularly how to correctly calculate total impedance when combining resistive and reactive components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of impedance for inductors and capacitors, questioning the treatment of real and imaginary components. There are attempts to clarify how to sum these components correctly to find total impedance. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of splitting current in parallel branches and whether the calculated current through the resistor can be 6.5 mA.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on maintaining the integrity of complex numbers in impedance calculations. Some participants have recalculated their values and are comparing results, while others are questioning their assumptions about current distribution in the circuit.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring that the calculations respect the nature of AC circuits, particularly regarding the behavior of inductors and capacitors. Participants are also navigating the constraints of homework requirements and the need for accuracy in their calculations.

KokoDaSilvaback
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Referencing the attached picture:

a) Show that the RMS current in the 1 kΩ resistor is 6.5mA.

b) If the AC voltage source was replaced by a battery, what would the current in the resistor be?

Homework Equations


V = IR
Z = √(R^2 + X^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


To begin, I calculated the impedance of the inductor and the capacitor, as well as the inductor and resistor. From these I found ZL&C = 1528.72Ω, and ZL&R = 843.56Ω.

Next (and this is where I think I may have gone wrong), I added the values of these impedances together to find ZTotal = 2372.28Ω.

Rearranging Ohm's Law, I find that IRMS = 4.2 mA, which I assume can't be correct since I'm supposed to show that the current through the resistor is 6.5 mA. I assume I've made an error in calculating my impedance values, but after verifying with other online sources, I can't seem to find where my mistake is coming from. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Capture.PNG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I calculated the impedance of the inductor and the capacitor, as well as the inductor and resistor. From these I found ZL&C = 1528.72Ω, and ZL&R = 843.56Ω.
You need to preserve the real and imaginery components of these complex impedances before the two can be summed.
 
NascentOxygen said:
You need to preserve the real and imaginery components of these complex impedances before the two can be summed.
So in that case would I treat the reactance (XL and XC) as entirely imaginary and the resistance as real? Once those are found, then calculate the impedance of the circuit?
 
KokoDaSilvaback said:
So in that case would I treat the reactance (XL and XC) as entirely imaginary and the resistance as real? Once those are found, then calculate the impedance of the circuit?
Yes. Not only are the reactances imaginery, but XC has a negative sign.

So what is the complex impedance of the R || L combination?
 
NascentOxygen said:
Yes. Not only are the reactances imaginery, but XC has a negative sign.

So what is the complex impedance of the R || L combination?
For a parallel circuit I have: $$Z = \frac {1} {\sqrt{(1/R)^2 + (1/jwl)^2}},$$ but when I perform that calculation, the inductance is no longer imaginary, as I have to use the complex conjugate in order to properly calculate the impedance of the parallel branch. The value I got from this calculation was 843.56
 
It's true that L appears in both the real and imaginary expressions of your Z. You have to keep Z as a complex number, to be able to add further series impedances to it.
 
So rather than take the magnitude of the parallel impedance, simply add 1/R and 1/XL, then add those values to the rest of the reactance values, leaving the impedance calculation for the final step?
 
Using the complex conjugate, express Z as the sum of a real component and an imaginary component.
 
Ok, after rerunning the number and keeping my real portion separate from my imaginary portion, I end up with an impedance of 1528.72Ω, which when used to divide the 10VRMS, gives me IRMS = 6.54mA. That value closely matches the value sought, but do I now need to calculate the voltage drop across each component? Or is the resistor the only component that is considered since the inductor and capacitor behave differently due to the oscillating voltage?
 
  • #10
KokoDaSilvaback said:
I end up with an impedance of 1528.72Ω, which when used to divide the 10VRMS, gives me IRMS = 6.54mA. That value closely matches the value sought
That reads as though you have found the total current. The question asks for that current in the resistor, and not including that in its parallel inductance.
 
  • #11
NascentOxygen said:
The question asks for that current in the resistor, and not including that in its parallel inductance.
So I'm back to square one essentially? Since the current will split between the parallel branches, there is no way 6.5mA will go to the resistor.
 
  • #12
KokoDaSilvaback said:
So I'm back to square one essentially? Since the current will split between the parallel branches, there is no way 6.5mA will go to the resistor.
I can't say without knowing the relative impedances of R and L. So test this result before concluding you have gone wrong somewhere—because you might actually be correct. :confused:
 
Last edited:
  • #13
So, the impedance of the parallel portion is ##(R^{-1}+ (jwl)^{-1})^{-1}##, correct? That preserves the real and imaginary components, which can then be added in series with the other impedance values.
 
  • #14
KokoDaSilvaback said:
So, the impedance of the parallel portion is ##(R^{-1}+ (jwl)^{-1})^{-1}##, correct? That preserves the real and imaginary components, which can then be added in series with the other impedance values.
Yes, so long as you keep the ##j## in your expression for ##Z##. But it won't save you any work whether you do the calculation in one step or 2 smaller steps because you need a complex conjugate in either case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K