RMS speed in kinetic energy equation for gas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of root mean square (RMS) speed in the kinetic energy equation Ek = 1/2 m vrms², highlighting that using mean speed squared would yield incorrect results. Kinetic energy is calculated as 1/2 mvi² for individual molecules, and the average kinetic energy requires the average of v², not the square of the average speed. The mean velocity of gas particles is zero due to their random motion in all directions, necessitating the use of RMS speed. Participants clarify that while the mean speed could be used, it would not accurately reflect kinetic energy since it is proportional to v². The discussion emphasizes the mathematical distinction that the mean square is not the same as the square of the mean.
zanyzoya
Gold Member
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have been pondering. Why is it that we use the rms speed in the equation Ek = 1/2 m vrms2, as opposed to just the mean speed2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because kinetic energy is 1/2 mv2. The kinetic energy of molecule i is 1/2 mvi2, so the average kinetic energy is 1/2m * (average of v2). If you used the square of the mean speed you would get a different, wrong answer. (The mean velocity is, of course, zero.)
 
  • Like
Likes lychette
mjc123 said:
Because kinetic energy is 1/2 mv2. The kinetic energy of molecule i is 1/2 mvi2, so the average kinetic energy is 1/2m * (average of v2). If you used the square of the mean speed you would get a different, wrong answer. (The mean velocity is, of course, zero.)
I agree
 
Thanks for your help with that mjc 123 and lychette, it makes much more sense now. :smile:
 
We are using V(rms) as mean velocity of the system will come out to be zero as particles are moving randomly in all the directions, So Rms (Root Mean Square) is taken.V^2(Rms) = N1 x V1^2 + N2 x V2^2 Divided by N1 + N2Here N is molecule and V is its velocity. As it is a square all velocities will become positive.
 
That is true, but as pointed out above it is not the only reason. You could use the mean speed (magnitude of the velocity), but that would give the wrong answer because KE is proportional to v2, so you need the average value of v2. The mean square is not equal to the square of the mean.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top