Rocket experiment: conservation of energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the conservation of energy in rocket launches, specifically addressing the discrepancies between calculated maximum height and actual height achieved. Key factors contributing to energy loss include friction between the rocket and the launch pad, as well as wind resistance, which affects the rocket's ascent. Participants clarified that while energy is conserved in total, it can be transformed into other forms, such as heat due to friction. The burning of the rocket engine also plays a role in energy dynamics during the launch.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic and potential energy
  • Familiarity with the principles of energy conservation
  • Basic knowledge of friction and air resistance
  • Concept of work done on a system
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of air resistance on projectile motion
  • Study the principles of thermodynamics related to energy transformation
  • Explore the role of friction in mechanical systems
  • Learn about rocket propulsion and the physics of rocket engines
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching energy conservation concepts, and anyone interested in the mechanics of rocket launches and energy dynamics.

jnimagine
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Hi i posted a question about the rocket experiment i did at school a few days ago but i just need some clarifications on some things.
I know that when a rocket is launched, not all kinetic energy is transferred to potential energy as it travels. That's why when i used formulas to figure out the energies and figured out the maximum height that was reached, was totally different from the actual height. Some of u guys helped me out by saying that the differnence in height is caused by losses of energy, friction between rocket and the launch pad, and wind.
I don't quite understand though, how energy would be lost because I thought energy is never lost. Does any of this have to do with the burning of the engine? and how would wind cause the calculation of the max. height to be so different from the actual height?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jnimagine said:
Hi i posted a question about the rocket experiment i did at school a few days ago but i just need some clarifications on some things.
I know that when a rocket is launched, not all kinetic energy is transferred to potential energy as it travels. That's why when i used formulas to figure out the energies and figured out the maximum height that was reached, was totally different from the actual height. Some of u guys helped me out by saying that the differnence in height is caused by losses of energy, friction between rocket and the launch pad, and wind.
I don't quite understand though, how energy would be lost because I thought energy is never lost. Does any of this have to do with the burning of the engine? and how would wind cause the calculation of the max. height to be so different from the actual height?
I didn't see your prior post, however, generally speaking, energy can be lost, gained, or conserved, depending on the work done on the system. If a block is at rest on a frictionless table, with no energy, and you push it, it gains energy because of the work you must do to get it moving. The same block might then lose energy when it runs into a surface with friction. Or keep the same energy when only gravity is involved (like if it just fell off the table to the floor, energy would be conserved. Actually, when you consider that energy is required by a person when he pushes the block (chemical energy), or that work done by friction is converted to heat energy (the table gets hotter), in that sense, all total energy is conserved in each case. Regarding the wind force, that might be an air resistance force that slows the flight, and can create tremendous heat.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
923
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
3K