Rocket launches up starting from zero, conservation momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of conservation of momentum and energy principles to determine the final velocity of a rocket ejecting exhaust at a velocity of 4000 m/s. The initial mass of the rocket, denoted as mi, and the final mass, mf, are critical in calculating the rocket's performance. The ideal rocket equation is referenced to derive the necessary mass of propellant required to accelerate a one-ton payload to 10% of the speed of light. The conclusion emphasizes that achieving such speeds with conventional chemical rockets is impractical due to the immense mass of fuel required.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum and energy principles
  • Familiarity with the ideal rocket equation
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics and dynamics
  • Concept of relativistic speeds and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the ideal rocket equation in detail
  • Explore the implications of relativistic physics on rocket propulsion
  • Research advanced propulsion methods beyond chemical rockets
  • Investigate the mass-energy equivalence principle in the context of space travel
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in rocket science and propulsion systems.

ex81
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rocket ejects exhaust with an velocity of u. The rate at which the exhaust mass is used (mass per unit time) is b. We assume that the rocket accelerates in a straight line starting initial mass (fuel plus the body and payload) be mi, and mf be its final mass, after all the fuel is used up. (a) Find the rocket's final velocity, v, in terms of u, mi, mf. (b) A typical exhaust velocity for chemical rocket engines is 4000m/s. Estimate the initial mass of a rocket that could accelerate a one-ton payload to 10% of the speed of light, and show that this design won't work. (ignore the mass of the fuel tanks.)


Homework Equations



Kinetic Energy = 1/2 mv^2
momentum = mv
work = f*d
f=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I started out with the conservation of energy, and then switched to the conservation of momentum.

The rocket starts out at rest. so mi*vi = 0

0 = mf*v +(mi-mf)*u
which makes sense since the rocket's momentum will be opposite to the exhaust velocity, and the two momentum will cancel.

Now is the part where I am stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look up the ideal rocket equation. Although it is basically a Newton's third law momentum problem, it is not that simple to develop it on your own.

AM
 
It is in the conservation section of the book. Ergo I have to use the conservation law :-(
I do realize that I need to differentiate the equation but I am pretty sure I need to tweak my current equation. Due to the change in mass vs velocity.
 
ex81 said:
It is in the conservation section of the book. Ergo I have to use the conservation law :-(
I do realize that I need to differentiate the equation but I am pretty sure I need to tweak my current equation. Due to the change in mass vs velocity.
Ok. You can do a rough estimate using conservation of momentum.

Use the centre of mass frame - the earth. Initial momentum is 0. In order for you to get 1000kg moving at .9c how much mass moving at 4000 m/sec in the opposite direction will you need so that the total momentum is 0?

AM
 
I think I am on the right track just from looking at NASA's ideal rocket equation
0 = mf*v +(mi-mf)*u

now NASA has dm * u/dt= v * d(mass propellant)/dt. Cancel out their dt, and their equation is dm *u=v*d(mass propellant)

So based on the above my equation needs to change a little, and needs to be derived.
 
P.S. my u, and v is switched from NASA's
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K