1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Rod falling faster than gravity

  1. Mar 23, 2017 #1
    Harvard University has an interesting article on a rod whose end that falls faster than gravity around a pivot.
    How did they derive this formula?

    fasterthang-eq1.png Where R is length of rod/2, or the centre of mass.

    Why did they use cos instead of sin?

    Also, in this formula
    Why did they use Lcos instead of L/2 cos?

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 24, 2017 #2
    The article is interesting indeed but the effect is well known for ages. Take a ##\Gamma-##shaped tube in the vertical plane such that the shoulders of this tube are vertical and horizontal. Put a chain in this tube such that half of this chain is contained in the vertical shoulder. Due to gravity the chain begins to slide and the acceleration of its links is very greater than g till a part of the chain remains in the horizontal shoulder
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2017
  4. Mar 24, 2017 #3
    Thank you but I am still unsure about the derivation.
  5. Mar 24, 2017 #4
    The weight of the rod has a component directed through the pivot and a tangential component causing acceleration.
  6. Mar 24, 2017 #5

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Note that θ is the angle that the board makes with the horizontal, not the angle between the R vector and the weight. (If that was what you were thinking.)

    You can also think of Rcosθ as the perpendicular distance between the line of the force (gravity) and the pivot. Or you can think of Mgcosθ as the component of the weight perpendicular to the board. (That was John Park's point.)
    They want the acceleration at the end of the rod, which has length L. (Note that R = L/2.)
  7. Mar 24, 2017 #6
    Thanks everyone! :)
    If the end of the rod was also be attached and pulling down on some mass M, would the torque also consider tension in the force?
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted