Rod with current and magnetic field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of a rod carrying a current I, rolling on parallel rails in a uniform magnetic field B. The key equations used include F = I L x B = ma and the relationship between work and energy. The final speed of the rod as it leaves the rails is derived as v = (2/sqrt(3)) * sqrt(IdBL/m). The moment of inertia and angular velocity calculations confirm that the radius R does not influence the final speed, which is a surprising yet established conclusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with magnetic forces on current-carrying conductors
  • Knowledge of rotational dynamics and moment of inertia
  • Basic principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz force law in electromagnetism
  • Learn about the relationship between torque and angular acceleration in rigid body dynamics
  • Explore energy conservation principles in rolling motion
  • Investigate the effects of varying radius on moment of inertia and its implications
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and rotational dynamics, particularly in the context of current-carrying conductors.

gsquare567
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rod of mass m and radius R rests on two parallel rails that are a distance d apart and have a length L. The rod carries a current I and rolls along the rails without slipping. A uniform magnetic field B is directed perpendicular to the road and the rails, pointing downwards. If it starts from rest, what is the speed of the rod as it leaves the rails.


Homework Equations


(1) F = I L x B = ma
(2) torque = r x F


The Attempt at a Solution


By subbing in the given constants into (1), I get a = IdB/m. However, I think that I need to use equation 2 instead. I am wondering how to relate the torque on the rod to the velocity of the rod. I don't think the the acceleration I got applies to the rod, because it receives its motion due to torque, rather than just the magnetic force.

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It could be done with force and torque, but I think the easier way is to
- calculate the force on the rod and work done over the distance L
- work = linear kinetic energy + rotational energy
- solve for v, which will appear in both energy terms
 
ok, let me see if i got it straight:

W = Krotational + Ktranslational = 1/2Iw^2 + 1/2mv^2 = 1/2(1/2mR^2)(v/R)^2 + 1/2mv^2 = 3/4mv^2
and
W = F * d = (IdB)(L)
so
3/4mv^2 = IdBL
v = 2/sqrt(3) sqrt(IdBL/m)
now my question is, why doesn't the radius of the rod, R, matter? did i use the right moment of inertia and angular velocity?
 
It looks correct to me. The calculation itself "explains" why R doesn't appear in the answer I guess. A wee bit surprising, though.
 
Interesting. Thanks for all your help!
 
Most welcome.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K