Roller coaster physics conceptual question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of roller coasters, specifically addressing why power must be calculated at the bottom of a loop. Key concepts include the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy, as well as the role of velocity in determining power. The relevant equations are Power = Work/time, Work = Force * Distance, and Force = Mass * Acceleration. The conclusion emphasizes that understanding energy conversion and the effects of gravity and normal force are crucial for solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic and potential energy concepts
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion in physics
  • Knowledge of forces acting on objects in motion
  • Basic grasp of energy conservation principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the effects of gravity on objects in motion
  • Explore the relationship between velocity and kinetic energy
  • Investigate the concept of normal force in circular motion
USEFUL FOR

High school physics students, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the physics of roller coasters and energy transformations.

Ryan Saunders

Homework Statement


For my high school physics class we made roller coasters out of card stock with various loops and funnels. We then had multiple questions to answer. I couldn't seem to figure this one out.

Why does the power have to be found at the bottom of the loop? Explain in terms of both energy and velocity.

Homework Equations


Power=Work/time
Work=Force*Distance or the change in kinetic energy
Force=Mass*Acceleration

The Attempt at a Solution


I figured that the conversion from kinetic energy (at the bottom of the loop) to potential energy (at the top of the loop) could have an affect on the power. But I was not sure about how velocity played a part. I also know that gravity is constantly pulling down on the marble and force normal is keep it on the track, but like before I didn't know how to incorporate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think we need to see earlier parts of the question to understand the context.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
871
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K