Rolling hemispheres and moments of inertia

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a uniform hemisphere using the parallel axis theorem and analyzing its motion when rolling on a rough horizontal plane. The moment of inertia about the center of mass is derived as I_{c.o.m} = (83/320)Ma^2, confirming the calculation despite its complexity. The second part of the problem involves expressing the instantaneous speed of the center of mass in terms of the angle θ and the distance b, leading to a derived equation for the rate of change of θ. The conversation highlights the application of Lagrangian mechanics for further analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia and the parallel axis theorem
  • Familiarity with basic mechanics concepts, including potential and kinetic energy
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics principles
  • Ability to work with trigonometric relationships in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the parallel axis theorem in different geometries
  • Learn about Lagrangian mechanics and its use in analyzing rolling motion
  • Explore the derivation of equations of motion for rolling objects
  • Investigate the relationship between angular velocity and linear velocity in rolling without slipping
USEFUL FOR

Students of mechanics, physics educators, and anyone interested in advanced dynamics and rotational motion analysis.

Mathmos6
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi there - I'm working through a bit of mechanics revision and have been looking at some of my uni past exam papers from a good few years back when the syllabus was different, so I'm not familiar with a lot of the material covered - it's not strictly relevant to my current course but I've found myself stuck on this question about hemispheres and it's bugging me, relevant or not. Could someone please give me a little help with how to progress? Thanks a lot.

i) Use the parallel axis theorem to calculate the moment of inertia of a uniform hemisphere of mass 'M' and radius 'a' about an axis through its centre of mass and parallel to the base (the centre of mass is located at a distance of 3a/8 from the flat face of the hemisphere).

Well the moment of inertia of the hemisphere about the axis which would be through the centre of mass of a full sphere is \frac{2ma^2}{5}, as it is for a sphere, so by the parallel axes theorem, I_{c.o.m}+M(\frac{3a}{8})^2=\frac{2Ma^2}{5} so I_{c.o.m}=Ma^2(\frac{2}{5}-\frac{9}{64})=\frac{83}{320}Ma^2. Now for a start, 83/320 seems like about the ugliest moment of inertia coefficient I've ever seen, so I'm pretty sure I've gone wrong somewhere here - but where?

ii) The hemisphere initially rests on a rough horizontal plane with its base vertical. It is then released from rest and rolls on the plane without slipping. Let \theta be the angle that the base makes with the horizontal at time t - express the instantaneous speed of the centre of mass in terms of b and the rate of change of \theta, where b is the instantaneous distance from the centre of mass to the point of contact with the plane. Hence write down expressions for the potential and kinetic energy of the hemisphere and deduce that (\frac{d \theta}{dt})^2=\frac{15gcos\theta}{(28-15cos\theta)a}.


Now I really have no idea what on Earth to do on this one, and I can see that part (i) is probably relevant but it's not rotating around the centre of mass ('C') so I can only assume they want us to calculate another moment of inertia which is just plain annoying. The picture I have has that the midpoint of the 'base edge' (where the centre of mass of a full sphere would be - call this point 'P', say) is always directly above the point of contact of the sphere and the surface - call this 'B' say - I'm pretty sure this is correct because at the very least it's true at the start and the end of the motion. In that case, by the cosine rule for the triangle CPB, the length of side CB squared is b^2=a^2 + \frac{9a^2}{64}-2(a)(\frac{3a}{8})cos(\theta)=a^2(\frac{73-48cos\theta}{64}) which again seems wrong. Even if that is the correct expression for b^2, I'm not sure how to express the speed of the centre of mass in terms of b and \dot \theta, and will the kinetic energy expression include an \frac{I{\dot \theta}^2}{2} or an \frac{mv^2}{2} or both? Apologies for my cluelessness, as I said this is a fair bit off the syllabus I'm meant to know! Thanks a lot,

Mathmos6
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For Part i you appoached the problem correctly. I'll look at ii. Are you familiar with Lagangian Mechanics?
 
I don't believe so but if you point me in the right direction I'll be happy to read up! So the moment of inertia -is- that ugly thing?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K