Rolling Motion of a motorcycle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the angular acceleration of motorcycle tires during rolling motion without slipping. Given a linear speed of 22.0 m/s achieved in 9 seconds and a tire radius of 0.280 meters, the relationship between linear and angular acceleration is crucial. The correct approach involves using the formula for linear acceleration, which is derived from the change in velocity over time, and relating it to angular acceleration through the tire's radius. The key takeaway is that the angular acceleration can be calculated using the formula α = a/r, where 'a' is the linear acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear and angular motion concepts
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion
  • Knowledge of the relationship between linear and angular velocity
  • Basic grasp of friction's role in preventing slipping
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate linear acceleration using the formula a = Δv/Δt
  • Learn about the relationship between linear acceleration and angular acceleration
  • Explore the concept of rolling motion and its applications in physics
  • Investigate the effects of friction on vehicle dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rolling motion in vehicles.

grandprix
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Assume that there is no slipping of the surfaces in contact during the rolling motion.

A motorcycle accelerates uniformly from rest and reaches a linear speed of 22.0 m/s in a time of 9s. The radius of each tire is 0.280 meters. What is the magnitude of the angular acceleration of each tire?


Homework Equations



really not sure what I am doing.

The Attempt at a Solution


In the book it says that when there is no slipping, that tangential velocity = linear velocity. And since [tex]\alpha[/tex] = [tex]\Delta\omega[/tex]/[tex]\Deltat[/tex] , took 22 and divided it by 9 seconds..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
and then I multiplied it by the radius .280

because tang. acceleration = r * angular acceleration
 
grandprix said:

The Attempt at a Solution


In the book it says that when there is no slipping, that tangential velocity = linear velocity.

Yes. Do you understand WHY this is the case, though? It's saying that if your tires have perfect grip, then for every centimetre that the tires advance, the vehicle advances by the same distance. Can you see that if you didn't have perfect grip/traction, then the tires would slide relative to the road, and so the tangential velocity of the tires would NOT necessarily have to be equal to the linear velocity of the vehicle? For example, imagine you did a "burn" in which you hit the brakes and the accelerator at the same time. Your tires would be spinning in place quite fast (with some non-zero velocity), whereas your vehicle would be going nowhere (zero velocity). This is becase your tires would be slipping (there would be relative motion between the tires and the road...the two surfaces would be sliding past each other as you "burned" rubber). I hope this explains to you why friction is necessary to prevent slipping and enable a vehicle to move forward when its tires spin. It is the reaction force of friction from the road on the tires that propels the vehicle forward.

grandprix said:
And since [tex]\alpha[/tex] = [tex]\Delta\omega[/tex]/[tex]\Delta t[/tex] , took 22 and divided it by 9 seconds..

Umm yeah. The problem with that is that omega is not equal to 22 m/s, so plugging in 22 m/s for omega makes no sense. What you have been given is the linear velocity, v, of the bike (or equivalently, the rotational velocity of of a point on the edge of a tire. What is the relationship between that velocity and the ANGULAR velocity of the tire (omega)?

Hint: As a more direct approach to the problem, what is the relationship between the linear acceleration of the bike (which you can calculate using the data you have been given), and the angular acceleration of its tires?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K