Rope falling through a hole on a frictionless table

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the differential equation for the motion of a rope with uniform density, ##\lambda=\frac{m}{L}##, falling through a hole on a frictionless table. Two methods are presented: the first method yields the equation $$\ddot{y}-\frac{g}{L}y=0$$, while the second method results in $$\ddot{y}-\frac{2g}{L}y=0$$. Participants agree that the first method is simpler and more accurate, as it correctly accounts for the force acting on the rope based solely on the length hanging down, ##y##. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the system's dynamics and the role of tension in the rope.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles, particularly Newton's laws of motion.
  • Familiarity with differential equations and their applications in physics.
  • Knowledge of uniform density concepts and how they apply to mass distribution.
  • Basic understanding of forces acting on objects in motion, including tension and gravity.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of differential equations in classical mechanics.
  • Learn about the role of tension in dynamic systems involving ropes and pulleys.
  • Explore the implications of mass distribution on motion, particularly in non-uniform systems.
  • Investigate the effects of friction and other forces on similar systems to understand real-world applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in the dynamics of systems involving ropes and forces.

Potatochip911
Messages
317
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A rope with uniform density ##\lambda=\frac{m}{L}## is placed on a frictionless table with an initial length ##y_0## hanging through the hole. Derive a differential equation for the position of the bottom of the rope and then using this solve for the time required for the rope to leave the table.

Homework Equations


##p=mv##
##F=\frac{dp}{dt}##
##p=\dot{m}v+m\dot{v}##

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm currently stuck with determining which differential equation I've derived is the correct one (although they only differ slightly).

The first method is just by analyzing the motion in the y direction. The acceleration will be given by ##ma=\lambda gy## where ##m## is the mass of the entire rope and ##y## (a function of time) is the length of the rope that's fallen through the hole. We can rewrite ##m## as ##\lambda L## from which we obtain: ##a=\frac{gy}{L}## or written more conveniently $$\ddot{y}-\frac{g}{L}y=0$$

The second method is the way my professor suggested to go about solving it. We consider the forces in both the ##x## and ##y## directions. To do this I considered the mass on the table ##m_T## and the mass falling off the table ##m_F## separately. Defining the ##x## and ##y## axis so the movement on the x and y-axis will be positive, in the x direction we have $$F_x=\frac{dp}{dt}=\dot{m_T}v+m_T\dot{v}\hspace{5mm} \mbox{and} \hspace{5mm} F_y=\dot{m_F}v+m_F\dot{v}$$ Then using the relation ##\dot{m_T}=-\dot{m_F}## we can express the first equation as ##F_x=-\dot{m_T}v+m_T\dot{v}##. Now the same force ##\lambda gy## will act on both of the sections therefore $$F_x+F_y=2\lambda gy=\dot{v}(m_F+m_T)$$ Now using ##m_F=y\lambda## and ##m_T=\lambda(L-y)## we get ##2\lambda gy=\dot{v}\lambda L## which after cancelling terms and changing to a more convenient form: $$\ddot{y}-\frac{2g}{L}y=0$$

I feel like something is definitely off about the second method particularly with how the force is acting on the masses but I just can't see what.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not stick to the first method? It looks fine to me. The second method is unnecessarily complicated because all parts of the rope accelerate at the same rate whether it is vertical or horizontal. But the force on the rope depends only on the amount of rope hanging down (ie. y).

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911
Andrew Mason said:
Why not stick to the first method? It looks fine to me. The second method is unnecessarily complicated because all parts of the rope accelerate at the same rate whether it is vertical or horizontal. But the force on the rope depends only on the amount of rope hanging down (ie. y).

AM

Yea I agree with what you've said I just thought it was weird that it's almost the same equation but not quite.
 
Potatochip911 said:
The second method ...Now using ##m_F=y\lambda## and ##m_T=\lambda(L-y)## we get ##2\lambda gy=\dot{v}\lambda L## which after cancelling terms and changing to a more convenient form: $$\ddot{y}-\frac{2g}{L}y=0$$

Potatochip911 said:
Yea I agree with what you've said I just thought it was weird that it's almost the same equation but not quite.
There is only one force on the entire rope and it is λgy. The net force on the part hanging down is λgy - T where T is the tension in the rope.

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911
Andrew Mason said:
There is only one force on the entire rope and it is λgy. The net force on the part hanging down is λgy - T where T is the tension in the rope.

AM
Ah thanks that makes sense!
 
It is not stated whether the rope on the table is laid out straight or in a random heap. It makes quite a difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911
haruspex said:
It is not stated whether the rope on the table is laid out straight or in a random heap. It makes quite a difference.
I suppose I could've included a picture, in this case it is laid out straight on a table.
 
Potatochip911 said:
I suppose I could've included a picture, in this case it is laid out straight on a table.
Ok.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K