Rope falling through a hole on a frictionless table

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a rope with uniform density placed on a frictionless table, with part of it hanging through a hole. Participants are tasked with deriving a differential equation for the position of the bottom of the rope and determining the time required for the rope to leave the table.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss two methods for deriving the differential equation, one focusing on vertical motion and the other considering forces in both x and y directions. There is uncertainty about the correctness of the second method, with some participants suggesting it is unnecessarily complicated.

Discussion Status

Some participants express agreement with the first method, indicating it appears to be a simpler and more direct approach. There is acknowledgment of the differences between the two derived equations, and one participant questions the assumptions regarding the rope's configuration on the table.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity regarding whether the rope on the table is laid out straight or in a random heap, which some participants note could significantly affect the problem's dynamics.

Potatochip911
Messages
317
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A rope with uniform density ##\lambda=\frac{m}{L}## is placed on a frictionless table with an initial length ##y_0## hanging through the hole. Derive a differential equation for the position of the bottom of the rope and then using this solve for the time required for the rope to leave the table.

Homework Equations


##p=mv##
##F=\frac{dp}{dt}##
##p=\dot{m}v+m\dot{v}##

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm currently stuck with determining which differential equation I've derived is the correct one (although they only differ slightly).

The first method is just by analyzing the motion in the y direction. The acceleration will be given by ##ma=\lambda gy## where ##m## is the mass of the entire rope and ##y## (a function of time) is the length of the rope that's fallen through the hole. We can rewrite ##m## as ##\lambda L## from which we obtain: ##a=\frac{gy}{L}## or written more conveniently $$\ddot{y}-\frac{g}{L}y=0$$

The second method is the way my professor suggested to go about solving it. We consider the forces in both the ##x## and ##y## directions. To do this I considered the mass on the table ##m_T## and the mass falling off the table ##m_F## separately. Defining the ##x## and ##y## axis so the movement on the x and y-axis will be positive, in the x direction we have $$F_x=\frac{dp}{dt}=\dot{m_T}v+m_T\dot{v}\hspace{5mm} \mbox{and} \hspace{5mm} F_y=\dot{m_F}v+m_F\dot{v}$$ Then using the relation ##\dot{m_T}=-\dot{m_F}## we can express the first equation as ##F_x=-\dot{m_T}v+m_T\dot{v}##. Now the same force ##\lambda gy## will act on both of the sections therefore $$F_x+F_y=2\lambda gy=\dot{v}(m_F+m_T)$$ Now using ##m_F=y\lambda## and ##m_T=\lambda(L-y)## we get ##2\lambda gy=\dot{v}\lambda L## which after cancelling terms and changing to a more convenient form: $$\ddot{y}-\frac{2g}{L}y=0$$

I feel like something is definitely off about the second method particularly with how the force is acting on the masses but I just can't see what.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not stick to the first method? It looks fine to me. The second method is unnecessarily complicated because all parts of the rope accelerate at the same rate whether it is vertical or horizontal. But the force on the rope depends only on the amount of rope hanging down (ie. y).

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911
Andrew Mason said:
Why not stick to the first method? It looks fine to me. The second method is unnecessarily complicated because all parts of the rope accelerate at the same rate whether it is vertical or horizontal. But the force on the rope depends only on the amount of rope hanging down (ie. y).

AM

Yea I agree with what you've said I just thought it was weird that it's almost the same equation but not quite.
 
Potatochip911 said:
The second method ...Now using ##m_F=y\lambda## and ##m_T=\lambda(L-y)## we get ##2\lambda gy=\dot{v}\lambda L## which after cancelling terms and changing to a more convenient form: $$\ddot{y}-\frac{2g}{L}y=0$$

Potatochip911 said:
Yea I agree with what you've said I just thought it was weird that it's almost the same equation but not quite.
There is only one force on the entire rope and it is λgy. The net force on the part hanging down is λgy - T where T is the tension in the rope.

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911
Andrew Mason said:
There is only one force on the entire rope and it is λgy. The net force on the part hanging down is λgy - T where T is the tension in the rope.

AM
Ah thanks that makes sense!
 
It is not stated whether the rope on the table is laid out straight or in a random heap. It makes quite a difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911
haruspex said:
It is not stated whether the rope on the table is laid out straight or in a random heap. It makes quite a difference.
I suppose I could've included a picture, in this case it is laid out straight on a table.
 
Potatochip911 said:
I suppose I could've included a picture, in this case it is laid out straight on a table.
Ok.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K