Rope tension and normal force of scales?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of rope tension and normal force as experienced in various physical scenarios, particularly involving pulleys and scales. Participants explore the implications of forces exerted by individuals and the Earth, questioning how these forces interact and affect measurements of weight and tension.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Mark questions whether the force exerted by a person on a rope results in double the force on the pulley due to the need for another force to maintain equilibrium.
  • Some participants suggest that tension in a rope requires forces applied from both ends, which complicates the understanding of how forces are measured in different scenarios.
  • Mark proposes that stepping on a force meter should yield a reading of double his weight because both he and the Earth exert forces on the scale.
  • Others clarify that when standing on a scale, the scale measures the force it exerts, which equals the person's weight, and does not double it.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between tension in a rope and the forces acting on a pulley, with some asserting that the tension in the rope is equal throughout, while the force on the pulley can be double due to the configuration of the rope.
  • One participant explains that the net force on the pulley is double the tension because the rope is doubled over the pulley, leading to two tension forces acting on it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the forces exerted on pulleys and scales, with no consensus reached on whether the readings on scales should reflect double the weight or not. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific conditions under which forces may be perceived as doubled.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific scenarios and diagrams to illustrate their points, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of tension and normal force, as well as the conditions under which these forces apply.

Make
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi, I thought I had some sort of an understanding in physics until I came across these two websites. On the first page the person in the air exerts a force on the rope but for the rope and person to stay still another force must be exerted by person number two hence the doubling of the force on the pulley and the rope compared to the person's weight hanging in the air, correct? If so, then why does the same not apply to "group number 4" ont he second page? And futhermore, if this is true, then stepping on a force meter(an arrangement that measures normal force) should give me a reading that is double my weight, right? This is because while I press down on the meter, also the Earth presses against it. And as a result of this "bathroom" weighing scales must have been set to half the mass of the equivalent force applied to them. But obviously I've got something wrong here. So I would really appreciate guidance here!

https://www.physicsforums.com/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=61

http://dev.physicslab.org/Document.aspx?doctype=5&filename=Dynamics_StaticEquilibrium.xml

Thanks

br
Mark
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Make said:
On the first page the person in the air exerts a force on the rope but for the rope and person to stay still another force must be exerted by person number two hence the doubling of the force on the pulley and the rope compared to the person's weight hanging in the air, correct?
Please repost the link to that "first page" so we can see what you are referring to. (Your first link has an error.)
If so, then why does the same not apply to "group number 4" ont he second page?
In order to have any tension in a (massless) rope, it must be pulled from each end.
And futhermore, if this is true, then stepping on a force meter(an arrangement that measures normal force) should give me a reading that is double my weight, right? This is because while I press down on the meter, also the Earth presses against it. And as a result of this "bathroom" weighing scales must have been set to half the mass of the equivalent force applied to them. But obviously I've got something wrong here. So I would really appreciate guidance here!
When you step on a scale, the Earth pulls down on you with a force equal to your weight and the scale pushes up on you with an equal force. (Otherwise you would be accelerating.) The scale measures the force it exerts, which is equal to your weight.
 
Whups! Sorry about that. Here's the first link. And about those scales... The Earth makes me push down on the scales. therefore they carry my weight. But also I attract the Earth making it push against hte scales. We squash the scales together with the Earth from both sides hence the reading of double my weight...

The link http://www.exo.net/~pauld/activities/physics/stringandpulley.html
 
Make said:
And about those scales... The Earth makes me push down on the scales. therefore they carry my weight. But also I attract the Earth making it push against hte scales. We squash the scales together with the Earth from both sides hence the reading of double my weight...
Think of the scale as a spring. To compress the spring, you need a force pushing at both ends (just like to tense a rope you need a force pulling at both ends). That doesn't mean the scale reads twice the force.
I'll take a look.
 
Make said:
On the first page the person in the air exerts a force on the rope but for the rope and person to stay still another force must be exerted by person number two hence the doubling of the force on the pulley and the rope compared to the person's weight hanging in the air, correct?
No, not correct. The only reason someone can exert a force on a rope is if something else is pulling on the other end. If there was just a person "pulling" on a rope in the air there would be zero tension in the rope and both would just fall to the ground. In the belayer diagram, if the belayer just let's go, the scale reading will go to zero and the climber will fall.
 
Group 4 is about the same as the belayer and climber situation. Assume the Belayer weighs the same as the climber, with both generating 600N of tension on the line. The tension in the line is 600N everywhere in the line, even if you put a tension measuring spring anywhere in the line. However the tension between the pulley and it's mount equals 2 times the tension in the line. Like wise, in group 4, the total downforce on the platform is twice the tension in the line.
 
A huge thanks for your effort! This is what I originally thought but then in this case I still don't get that part where the force is double on the pulley... What makes it double and in what sort of situations does this happen?
 
Make said:
This is what I originally thought but then in this case I still don't get that part where the force is double on the pulley... What makes it double and in what sort of situations does this happen?
Since the rope is doubled over the pulley, the rope tension pulls on it twice--thus the net force on the pulley is double the tension.

(This might help: Picture an imaginary box surrounding the pulley. You will see two ropes "attached" to that box, each exerting a force equal to the rope tension.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
24K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K