Rotation Mechanics [disk-axle mechanism]

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a disc rotating with a constant angular velocity and a rod connected to a ring that moves vertically. The scenario is set up to determine the angular velocity of the disc based on the motion of the rod and the ring at a specific angle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the motion of point A on the disc and the vertical movement of the ring. There are attempts to apply differential calculus to relate the components of the rod's length to the velocities involved. Questions arise regarding the assumptions about the fixed points and the geometry of the setup.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem using the constant length of the rod, while others are clarifying the relationships between the components of motion. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of reasoning have been established.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a fixed rod length and the geometry of the rotating system. There is an emphasis on understanding the implications of the angle and the distances involved in the setup.

rohanprabhu
Messages
410
Reaction score
2
[SOLVED] Rotation Mechanics [disk-axle mechanism]

Homework Statement



Q. A disc is fixed at its center O and rotating with constant angular velocity [itex]\omega[/itex]. There is a rod whose one end is connected at A on the disc and the other end is connected with a ring which can freely move along the fixed vertical smooth rod. At an instant when the rod is making an angle 30º with the vertical the ring is found to have a velocity [itex]v[/itex] in the upward direction. Find [itex]\omega[/itex] of the disk. Given that the point A is R/2 distance vertically above the point O and length of the rod AB is l.

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/4992/rotadiscaxlecl9.jpg

Homework Equations



I don't know.. maybe:

[tex]v = r\omega[/tex]
[tex]\tau = I^2\alpha[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



The point 'A' moves in the inner circle of radius 'R/2'. I tried marking two positions in the inner rim, at 'A' and 'a' where the angle made by the axle with the vertical rod is [itex]\theta[/itex] and [itex]\theta + d\theta[/itex]. The angle at the cross section of the two impressions of the rod comes out to be [itex]d\theta[/itex].

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7963/rotadiscaxleattit6.jpg

I somehow need to equate it with the angular displacement for the disk. The key idea here, however is that the length of the rod will remain constant. I'm just not able to understand as to how i go about using that...

also.. i think that if i can somehow prove that this is the case of rotation about a fixed point on the rod, then things will become much easier. how do i go about doing this?

any help is greatly appreciated. thanks...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether the disc and the vertical rod are in the same plane? Whether the point A on the rod is firmly fixed or pivot around A?
 
Last edited:
rl.bhat said:
Whether the disc and the vertical rod are in the same plane? Whether the point A on the rod is firmly fixed or pivot around A?

Point 'A' is exactly above the center of the circle when the axle makes 30º with the vertical rod. At other times, it is a point on a concentric circle on the disc of radius R/2.

And yes, they are in the same plane...
 
Take advantage of the fact that the length of the rod doesn't change. View its length as having vertical and horizontal components (Y & X, say). At the moment in question, the horizontal component is increasing at the rate of [itex]\omega R[/itex] (since end A is moving horizontally), so at what rate must the vertical component decrease to keep the length constant? (Think in terms of differentials.)
 
ok.. so here's what I've assumed. Have a look at the figure:

http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/1679/solutiononeen5.jpg

I've dropped a perpendicular on the vertical rod from the point 'A' at 'B'. I've taken the distance of this horizontal as 'y'. Also, the distance from the point of contact of the rod and the axle and 'B' is taken as 'x'.

So, we have:

[tex] x^2 + y^2 = l^2[/tex]

diff. both sides w.r.t. time:

[tex] 2x\frac{dx}{dt} + 2y\frac{dy}{dt} = 0[/tex]

Now, here [itex]\frac{dx}{dt} = v[/itex] and [itex]\frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{R\omega}{2}[/itex]

on substituting these values, i get:

[tex] v = -\frac{y}{x} \frac{R\omega}{2}[/tex]

here, [itex]\frac{y}{x} = tan(\frac{\pi}{6}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}[/itex]

So,

[tex] \omega = -\frac{2\sqrt{3}v}{R}[/tex]

is it right??

I have an option like that.. but they're all positive... what does my negative sign indicate? Although it does indicates the direction of axis of rotation.. but ofcourse it has to be relative to the assumptions i have taken for sign convention. So, relative to what exactly is the positive sign...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
rohanprabhu said:
So, we have:

[tex] x^2 + y^2 = l^2[/tex]

diff. both sides w.r.t. time:

[tex] 2x\frac{dx}{dt} + 2y\frac{dy}{dt} = 0[/tex]

Now, here [itex]\frac{dx}{dt} = v[/itex]
Looks good.
and [itex]\frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{R\omega}{2}[/itex]
Why did you divide by 2? [Correction: Looks good!]
on substituting these values, i get:

[tex] v = -\frac{y}{x} \frac{R\omega}{2}[/tex]

here, [itex]\frac{y}{x} = tan(\frac{\pi}{6}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}[/itex]

So,

[tex] \omega = -\frac{2\sqrt{3}v}{R}[/tex]

is it right??
Except for that factor of 2. [Correction: Looks good!]

I have an option like that.. but they're all positive... what does my negative sign indicate? Although it does indicates the direction of axis of rotation.. but ofcourse it has to be relative to the assumptions i have taken for sign convention. So, relative to what exactly is the positive sign...
The vertical component of the rod length (your X value) decreases (thus is negative) at the same rate that end B rises (and is thus positive).

Edit: I was taking R as the distance from point A to the axis, but that distance is R/2 not R. Thanks to Shooting star for pointing out my error.
 
Last edited:
The rotating point where one end of the rod is fixed is at a dist of R/2 from the centre.
 
Shooting star said:
The rotating point where one end of the rod is fixed is at a dist of R/2 from the centre.
D'oh! My bad. (I'll correct my error in the previous post. Thanks, Ss!)
 
Doc Al said:
The vertical component of the rod length (your X value) decreases (thus is negative) at the same rate that end B rises (and is thus positive).

k. I get it now.

thanks a lot to everybody who helped me out. Doc Al, shooting star.. u guys r gr8 :D
thanks again..
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K