Rotation of a point in R3 about the y-axis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the rotation of a point in three-dimensional space (R3) about the y-axis, specifically focusing on the mathematical representation of this rotation and the visual aids to understand it. Participants explore the implications of right-handed and left-handed coordinate systems, as well as the derivation of the equations governing the transformation of coordinates during rotation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in visualizing the rotation of a point about the y-axis and seeks assistance in deriving the equation for the x-coordinate from a geometric perspective.
  • Another participant questions the initial assumption about the orientation of the y-axis in the diagram, prompting a clarification about right-handed versus left-handed coordinate systems.
  • A suggestion is made to consider Rodrigues' rotation formula as a more general approach to understand the rotation, which could be applied to the specific case discussed.
  • A participant proposes to simplify the visualization by ignoring the y-axis and focusing on the x and z axes to establish relationships between the coordinates.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the orientation of the y-axis and corrects their earlier statement about the direction of rotation.
  • Another participant shares their findings on how to derive the x-coordinate visually, indicating that it involves adding the widths of certain triangles in their diagram.
  • A later reply discusses the relationship between the primed and unprimed axes, noting that the transformation can be viewed as a rotation of the coordinate system itself.
  • It is mentioned that the equations can also be derived using the sum of angles formulae for sine and cosine, linking the rotation to polar coordinates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for visualizing the rotation or the implications of the coordinate system orientation. Multiple competing views and approaches remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the correct orientation of the axes and the implications for visual representation. The discussion also highlights the potential complexity in deriving the equations, with various assumptions and interpretations present.

NatFex
Messages
26
Reaction score
3
Hello,

I'm having a visualisation problem. I have a point in R3 that I want to rotate about the ##y##-axis anticlockwise (assuming a right-handed cartesian coordinate system.) I know that the change to the point's ##x## and ##z## coordinates can be described as follows:

$$z = z'\cos\theta-x'\sin\theta$$
$$x = x'\cos\theta+z'\sin\theta$$

My problem is that I only seem to be able to know this "as fact" and I am trying to draw a visual aid to help me see how this has come about. I produced the following diagram: (I know the rotation looks clockwise but it's anticlockwise as the ##y##-axis is coming out of the page/screen)

34y1oa0.png

As you can see, the first equation for the ##z## coordinate of the point is derivable by looking at the heights (blue edges) of the pale yellow triangles. The longer blue edge is ##z'\cos\theta## by simple trig and the shorter one is ##x'\sin\theta##. Take the difference of the 2 to work out the ##z## coordinate (where the purple line touches the ##z##-axis) et voila.

The issue is I am struggling to come up with a similar visualisation for ##x##. I just can't find the right triangles to make that sum. I've burned through ~10 sheets of paper already. It's definitely one of those "need-to-disengage-to-see-clearly-again" situations because I have definitely done this before, but I figured someone on here might speed this tedious process up and guide me on how to visually represent the equation for ##x##. Either verbally point me in the right or scribble on top of my drawing, I'm not bothered. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 34y1oa0.png
    34y1oa0.png
    8.4 KB · Views: 730
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you say the y-axis is coming out of the screen ? Do you know about right-handed and left-handed coordinate systems ?
 
Another approach to understanding this could be to understand a more general exposition like Rodrigues' rotation formula [1] and then just apply the values that apply for your case. At least, for practical applications this a very handy equation.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodrigues'_rotation_formula
 
Visual aid: ignore y. Set up graph with x and z as axes. Then put in a pair of perpendicular lines through the origin and label them x' and z'. Label the angle between x and x' as ##\theta## and compute the relationships
 
BvU said:
What makes you say the y-axis is coming out of the screen ? Do you know about right-handed and left-handed coordinate systems ?
I was confused by your comment at first but you're right, I have it the wrong way around. OK, so the ##y##-axis (as per right-handed cartesian system) is going into the screen. The only way to make my diagram still relevant is to instead say that we're rotating clockwise around ##y##, so my little comment about that is completely irrelevant. Will edit the OP as necessary. EDIT: Seems I can't actually edit it any more.

mathman said:
Visual aid: ignore y. Set up graph with x and z as axes. Then put in a pair of perpendicular lines through the origin and label them x' and z'. Label the angle between x and x' as ##\theta## and compute the relationships
If you open the spoiler you will see that I had an attempt at exactly what you describe. Managed to get one (but not both) of the equations that way. This thread was made because I got stuck
 
Hi all, excuse the double post but since I just managed to find what I was looking for I thought I'd share in case anybody else finds seeing where the equations in the OP come from

Quick scribble since I can't be bothered to make it as neat as my original diagram at the moment:

a0uux5.png

The ##x##-coordinate is obtained by adding the 2 widths (neon green lines) of the fuchsia triangles.
 

Attachments

  • a0uux5.png
    a0uux5.png
    8.1 KB · Views: 624
NatFex said:
Hi all, excuse the double post but since I just managed to find what I was looking for I thought I'd share in case anybody else finds seeing where the equations in the OP come from

A couple of observations. You have taken a point in the ##x'-z'## system and calculated its coordinates in the ##x-z## system. Effectively, you have rotated your axes by ##\theta##. The primed axes are the unprimed axes rotated clockwise by ##\theta##.

This gives the same form of the equations as taking a vector in the ##x-z## system, with coordinates ##(x, z)##, and rotating it anticlockwise by ##\theta## and giving the coordinates of the new vector as ##(x', z')##.

Note that the simplest way to generate the coordinates is to use the sum of angles formulae for sine and cosine. If a vector has a polar angle of ##\alpha## anticlockwise from the x-axis and is rotated by an angle ##\theta## anticlockwise, then its new polar angle is ##\alpha + \theta##. If you expand the expressions for ##\cos(\alpha + \theta)## and ##\sin(\alpha + \theta)##, you get the required formula for the coordinates of a rotated vector.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K