Rotation of Vector in P: Why Divide by r?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Soff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the rotation of a vector in a coordinate system, particularly focusing on the mathematical formulation of the rotated coordinates and the role of the distance from the origin, denoted as "r." Participants are examining the correctness of the equations provided for passive rotation and the necessity of dividing by "r" in one of the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for rotating a vector that includes a division by "r" in the second equation and seeks clarification on its necessity.
  • Another participant argues against the need for "r," asserting that the correct rotation formulas do not include it and provides an example to illustrate this point.
  • A third participant references a professor's solution involving the same division by "r" and questions its purpose, indicating a desire for further explanation.
  • A suggestion is made to directly consult the professor for clarification on the matter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus; there are competing views regarding the inclusion of "r" in the rotation equations, with some asserting it is unnecessary while others reference it as part of a solution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion contains unresolved mathematical interpretations and assumptions regarding the definitions of "r" and the context of the vector rotation.

Soff
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
When you rotate passivly an arbitrary vector in [tex]P[/tex] (which is not in the origin of a coordinate system), you will get the following new coordinates for the same vector:

[tex]x'=x \cos\theta+y\sin \theta[/tex]
[tex]y'=\frac{1}{r}(y\cos \theta-x\sin\theta)[/tex]

where [tex]r[/tex] is the distance from the origin to the point [tex]P[/tex] and [tex]x,y[/tex] are the components of the vector. Can somebody explain me, why you have to divide by [tex]r[/tex] in the second equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't! For one thing, there is no "r" in the original information- unless you are assuming that r is the length of the vector <x, y>. But, in any case, there is no "r" in the correct formulas:
[tex]x'= x cos(\theta)+ y sin(\theta)[/tex]
[tex]y'= y cos(\theta)- x sin(\theta)[/tex]
which are simply what you give without the "r".

You can check by taking x= 2, y= 0 and rotating through [itex]\theta= 90[/itex] degrees.
Assuming, again, that r is the length of the vector, then here r= 2 and your formulas give x'= 2(0)+ 0(1)= 0, y'= (1/2)(2(1)- 1(0))= 1 but <0, 1> is a a vector with length 1.

Using the formulas without the r, you get x'= 2(0)+ 0(1)= 0, y'= 2(1)- 1(0)= 2 giving the vector <0, 2> which is correct.
 
I attached the graphic which describs the situation with the rotation. What I want is to describe the vector in the lower part of the system in coordinates of [tex]A^{\theta}[/tex] and [tex]A^{r}[/tex]. The professor told me that the solution is:

[tex]A^{r}=A^{x}\cos\theta+A^{y}\sin\theta[/tex]
[tex]A^{\theta}=\frac{1}{r}(A^{y}\cos\theta-A^{x}\sin\theta)[/tex]

The first component is simply a rotation, but why this factor [tex]\frac{1}{r}[/tex] in the second component?
 

Attachments

  • abb223.jpg
    abb223.jpg
    13.8 KB · Views: 447
Why don't you ask the professor?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K