Rotational motion down an incline (ring/hoop)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
floraha
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 24kg metal ring with 24cm diameter rolls without slipping down a 30 degree incline from a height of 3.4 m.

1) According to the law of conservation of energy what should be the linear speed of the ring at the bottom of the ramp
2) if the ring has a moment of inertia of I=mr^2 what will its linear speed be at the base of the incline?

3) what is the avg linear acc of this ring down the incline?

Homework Equations

3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
For part 1, I got the math down to the square root of 2gh, because I assumed they were just asking for Vfrictionless. I did this through the equation PE=KE(translational) + KE (rotational) from which I got mgh = 1/2mv^2+1/2iw^2 where i=moment of inertia and w=angular velocity. In this case (i) would just be zero, getting me 2gh

For part 2 I did the same thing, except I substituted the moment of inertia in for (i) getting the math down to the square root of gh.

I had the most difficult time with part three. I wasn't sure where to start so I just worked out a(tangental) = r * angular acceleration. My teacher told me the answer is gsin(x) but I have no idea how he got there.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
floraha said:
rolls without stopping
Are you sure that is the correct wording and it wasn't supposed to say, "rolls without slipping". Additionally, because it says "rolls", that suggests that it is not frictionless. If it was frictionless, it would not rotate at all; it would just slide.

Edit: Sorry I forgot to welcome you to Physics Forums. Welcome!
Edit2: Hmm. I think I can see your position that part 1 maybe is supposed to assume frictionless due to the wording of part 2. However, for part 1 the ring had the same moment of inertia as specified in part 2.
 
@TomHart Thank you for replying! You were right about the wording, it was actually "slipping." Also, for part 3 it autocorrected to arc when it should have been acc (as in acceleration).