Rotational Motion Homework: Find Kinetic Energy of Rod

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a thin rod of length L and mass m, which is suspended and allowed to swing like a pendulum. The task is to find the rod's kinetic energy at its lowest position in terms of its angular speed ω, mass m, length L, and gravitational acceleration g, while neglecting friction and air resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use the kinetic energy formula that includes both rotational and translational components but encounters confusion regarding the correct application of the moment of inertia. Some participants suggest focusing on the rotational kinetic energy formula alone, emphasizing the importance of the axis of rotation.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different approaches to calculate the kinetic energy, discussing the relevance of the moment of inertia about different axes. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the moment of inertia in relation to the center of mass and the pivot point, with acknowledgment that both methods can yield the same result.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need to consider the moment of inertia about the correct axis, and the discussion includes the implications of translating the center of mass while also accounting for rotational motion. The original poster expresses uncertainty about why both approaches are valid.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


A thin rod of length L and mass m is suspended freely from one end. It is pulled to one side and then allowed to swing like a pendulum, passing through its lowest position with angular speed ω. In terms of these symbols and g, and neglecting friction and air resistance, find the rod's kinetic energy at it's lowest position.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am a poor guy in rotational dynamics, please bare with me. :smile:
[tex]KE=\frac{1}{2}Iω^2+\frac{1}{2}Mv^2[/tex]
If i use this formula i get the wrong answer. The answer is [itex]\frac{ML^2ω^2}{6}[/itex].
If i use [tex]KE=\frac{1}{2}Iω^2[/tex], i get the right answer but i don't understand why is this correct? Why i can't use the first formula? Any explanation would be very helpful.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the first formula. Just be sure you are taking I about the center of mass and that the other KE term is the KE of the center of mass.

Of course it's much easier to use the second formula, as long as you take I about the pivot point. Taken about that point, the rod can be considered as purely rotating.
 
Doc Al said:
You can use the first formula. Just be sure you are taking I about the center of mass and that the other KE term is the KE of the center of mass.
Thank you, i was considering the center of mass but did not calculate I about the center of mass. :smile:

Doc Al said:
Taken about that point, the rod can be considered as purely rotating.
Any explanation on this?
 
The rod rotates about a fix axis, and the KE of a body rotating around a fix axis is 1/2 Iω2, where I is the moment of inertia with respect to the axis.

At the same time, you can consider the motion as translation of the CM (along a circle of radius L/2) and rotation about the CM. In this case, you have to use the moment of inertia with respect to the CM in the expression for the rotational KE. Try to figure out the expression for the KE. It must be the same as the former one.

ehild
 
ehild said:
The rod rotates about a fix axis, and the KE of a body rotating around a fix axis is 1/2 Iω2, where I is the moment of inertia with respect to the axis.

At the same time, you can consider the motion as translation of the CM (along a circle of radius L/2) and rotation about the CM. In this case, you have to use the moment of inertia with respect to the CM in the expression for the rotational KE.
Thank you for the explanation! :smile:

ehild said:
Try to figure out the expression for the KE. It must be the same as the former one.
I have tried solving the question by both the ways and i get the same answer, i was just making sure why both of them are correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K