Rotational to linear kinetic energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a hollow metal cylinder rolling off an inclined roof and the relationship between its rotational and linear kinetic energy. Participants explore the definitions and calculations related to kinetic energy in the context of rotational motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definitions of linear and rotational kinetic energy, questioning how they are related and how to calculate them. There are attempts to clarify the conditions for rolling without slipping and the implications of the cylinder transitioning to projectile motion after leaving the roof.

Discussion Status

Some participants have expressed understanding of the concepts and calculations involved, while others continue to seek clarification on specific points, such as the behavior of angular velocity when the cylinder is in the air. There is a mix of confirmed understanding and ongoing inquiry into the relationships between the energies involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the cylinder rolls without slipping and are considering the effects of transitioning from rolling to projectile motion. There is also a focus on ensuring the accuracy of calculations related to kinetic energy ratios at different points in the problem.

Daniiel
Messages
119
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 5kg hollow metal cylinder with a radius 0.1m rolls off the edge of a roof with an incline of 30degrees and height of 1metre.

If the cylinder was initially at rest, what is the ratio of the rotational to linear kinetic energy when it reaches the end of the roof?

and the ration when it hits the ground?


I don't understand what "The ratio of rotational to linear kinetic energy" means
does it mean the angular velocity? or the velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Daniiel said:
I don't understand what "The ratio of rotational to linear kinetic energy" means
does it mean the angular velocity? or the velocity?
I'm sure you know to find linear KE. It's just 1/2mv^2. How is rotational KE defined? How are they related? Hint: Assume it rolls without slipping.
 
so
KEr= 1/2 iw^2 (w being omega) and i(cylinder) = MR^2

do i plug in i = mr and then w = v/r? and make it = KE

i wrote it all out but it looked silly so i deleted it
is MR^2 the centre of mass of the cylinder? i read I = Icom + Mh^2
 
Daniiel said:
so
KEr= 1/2 iw^2 (w being omega) and i(cylinder) = MR^2
Good.

do i plug in i = mr and then w = v/r? and make it = KE
I don't understand what you're saying here. But w = v/r is the condition for rolling without slipping.


is MR^2 the centre of mass of the cylinder?
That's the rotational inertia about an axis through the center of mass, which is what you need.
i read I = Icom + Mh^2
That's the parallel axis theorem. Not needed here.
 
I think i understand now
I have to find the KE and KEr at the end of the slope, and show the difference as a ratio?

In air when it leaves the edge, would its angular velocity decrease? So i'd treat it as a projectile to find the time it takes to hit the ground and somhow find the angular velocity?
 
Daniiel said:
I think i understand now
I have to find the KE and KEr at the end of the slope, and show the difference as a ratio?
Right.

In air when it leaves the edge, would its angular velocity decrease?
What do you think? What's required for the angular velocity to change?
So i'd treat it as a projectile to find the time it takes to hit the ground and somhow find the angular velocity?
Yes. As soon as it leaves the roof, it's a projectile.
 
sorry for being a pest
i think, then over think, then make afew solutions, then have 0 confidence
at first i thought that in the air the angular velocity would decrease because there's no surface to roll on, but it'd be the angular acceleration decreasnig wouldn't it?
so the angular velocity doesn't change, so KEr is the same and and KE is different?
thanks for your patients ;)
 
Daniiel said:
at first i thought that in the air the angular velocity would decrease because there's no surface to roll on, but it'd be the angular acceleration decreasnig wouldn't it?
Not quite sure what you're saying here. Try and rephrase it.
so the angular velocity doesn't change, so KEr is the same and and KE is different?
That's true. Once it leaves the surface, there's no more friction to provide any torque, so the angular velocity--and thus rotational KE--doesn't change. Translational KE certainly does.
 
Thanks heaps for your help Doc Al.
I ended up getting for the edge of the roof the ratio 1:1 and then 7:1 7 being KE (linear)
Could i just double check my working in these two questions?
I prnt screened and wrote under the questions.
When i did the ski one i found the range of jump then found the t for that range, then halved t to find the highest point in the jump, and with that t found h

The other one seems to make sense, then smaller angle moves faster than the neutron at 60 degrees

Do you think i did it right?

[PLAIN]http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/8657/eeebb.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K