Rubber Ball response to impact?

AI Thread Summary
A rubber ball, when struck by a sprung plate moving at 70 mph, may not exceed that speed due to energy loss during compression and rebound. The method of launching—whether accelerating the ball to 70 mph or allowing the plate to hit a stationary ball—affects the outcome, but both scenarios likely yield similar results. The energy required to compress the ball during impact converts to thermal energy, reducing the kinetic energy transferred to the ball. The mass of the spring/plate assembly plays a crucial role, as a heavier assembly can transfer more kinetic energy to the ball, potentially resulting in a more explosive reaction. Understanding these dynamics is essential for optimizing ball launch mechanisms in pet projects.
marietta_ken
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Please forgive my ignorance on what may be simple topics for most of you. I'm just trying to get my head conceptually around a ball launching pet project I'm fiddling with.

If you take a rubber (tennis) ball, say of 5 oz mass, and blast it with a sprung plate moving at 70 mph, will the ball take off faster than 70 mph? Seems like it would due to the compression and rebound of the ball. How would you quantify that?

Along the same lines, which would yield a faster ball launch -- pushing it rapidly to 70 mph (so that it is somewhat compressed to plate during acceleration, or letting the plate get to 70 mph before it impales the stationary, possibly somewhat restrained, ball?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe it won't make much of a difference either way. In the first case however the ball will not travel faster, because the force needed to compress it, comes from the sprung plate. If anything it would receive lower kinetic energy than what comes from the plate because some the energy needed to compress it has turned into thermal energy in the ball.
 
Does the fact that the spring/plate assembly has much greater mass than the ball come into play. In other words, if you take the same amount of KE that exists in a massive spring/plate assy and transfer (a high %) of it to the ball, will the ball not react more "explosively?"
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Thread 'Free fall of person in a sled to direct horizontal motion by atmospheric resistance'

Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
View full post »

Similar threads

Spring constant to launch ball 70 mph?
Replies
19
Views
11K
What is the Velocity of the Ball Leaving a Racket Moving at 60 mph?
Replies
7
Views
2K
I How weather conditions affect a golf shot
Replies
6
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top