Rudder& elevator torque calculation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the torque required for the rudder and elevator motors of a radio-controlled miniature aircraft. Participants explore the necessary parameters and methods for these calculations, including airflow dynamics and aerodynamic forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on calculating the torque for the rudder and elevator motors, mentioning specific dimensions and airflow conditions.
  • Another participant questions the original poster's understanding of fluid dynamics concepts, suggesting that they should draw a free body diagram.
  • The original poster shares a free body diagram and asks how to calculate the torque at the hinge point, expressing uncertainty about which area to use in the formula for lift.
  • A participant suggests considering a worst-case scenario with simplifying assumptions, proposing a formula for force based on a flat plate perpendicular to the airflow.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the reasoning behind simplifying assumptions and encourages the original poster to practice making such decisions in engineering.
  • A later reply provides additional insights on the expected range of motion for the rudder and elevator, suggesting a method to estimate torque based on the angle of deflection and the position of the aerodynamic center.
  • Participants express supportive sentiments towards the original poster, encouraging them not to feel discouraged about their questions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the specific methods for calculating torque, as participants offer different approaches and assumptions. The discussion includes varying perspectives on simplifying assumptions and the complexity of the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the dependence on specific assumptions regarding airflow and the aerodynamic center, which may vary with the aircraft's pitch. The discussion highlights the complexity of accurately calculating aerodynamic forces due to multiple influencing factors.

ank_gl
Messages
741
Reaction score
0
hi, i m currently working on a radio controlled miniature aircraft for a local competition,,,,,,but i don't know how to calculate the torque required for the rudder & elevator motors.fuselage is about 200cms.airflow is abt 8-10m/s

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

please tell me what else is required for the calculations & also what type of motors to use
pleasezzzzzzzzz helpppppppppppppp
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What school level are you at? Are you familiar with continuity and momentum in a fluid stream? Do you understand the concept of moments about an axis?

It's policy to not just spoon feed you answers to questions. You have to do some work. So let's start with...have you drawn a free body diagram?
 
i have attached the free body diagram...
airflow produces lift on the elevator...we get anticlockwise moment about the aerodynamic center and nose pitces down...all i want to know is how do i calculate the torque which is experienced at the hinge point coz i don't know which area to take in formula
FL=1/2*ρ*V2*CL*Area
and at what point does this force acts?

also doesn't the aerodynamic centre change when the plane pitches up or down... as far as i know, it should & then how should i take it into account?:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

sorry for asking such silly questions :blushing: :blushing: :blushing: :blushing: :blushing:


also pleasezzzzzzzz don't yell at me...i don't have anyone to help me
 

Attachments

  • fbd.JPG
    fbd.JPG
    10.6 KB · Views: 775
I would spend my time on what would be the worst case scenario. Making some simplifying assumptions, that would be the elevator is a flat plate almost perpendicular to the flow. In this case the force developed by the form drag would be simply

[tex]F=\frac{1}{2}\rho A V^2[/tex]

Since the plate is perpendicular to the flow, the center of pressure should be at the geometric center of the elevator. That will allow you to calculate the maximum torque that the aero forces are applying to the elevator and thus the max torque your servo/linkage system must provide to move it.
 
thanks man...
i almost can't believe that i m so stupid
 
Hey. Don't think like that. It took me a little bit to sit down and think about it. The important thing is that it makes sense to you as to why I suggested that method. There are other, more elaborate ways, to do it, but why not try to break it down to the easiest scenario if you can? Usually, this will lead you to a very conservative number. You can then decide if it's worth your time to make more detailed calculations. That, in many cases, is a tough skill to develop for an engineer. When can you make simplifying assumptions that will still remain valid for your situation? When should I deviate from those simplifications? It takes practice.

Good luck.
 
thanx for the advice sir
 
Just to add a bit, you're probably not going to turn your rudder and elevetor beyond like maybe 20-25 degrees for a standard configuration. So you multiply that force by the sine of the angle and for a standard airframe you can assume your aerodynamic center is at about the middle of the wing and about the height of the middle of the body and doesn't move that much. So yeah this should give you a pretty good estimate. And really needless to blame yourself, because believe me that calculating these things exactly - with the speed altered because of the engine and the wing altering the flow and many many other factors it gets VERY complex. Also a good idea is get some help from someone who builds these things already or search for info on similar designs on the web - there's a lot of it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K