Run-down of a wheel as a func. of time from full speed to standstill.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around modeling the rundown of a wheel from a constant angular velocity to a standstill, focusing on the relationship between kinetic energy and frictional losses. Participants are exploring how to derive an equation that describes this process, given initial conditions such as angular velocity and inertia.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between frictional power loss and angular velocity, questioning how to express torque in relation to these variables. There are attempts to derive differential equations that relate energy loss due to friction to the angular velocity of the wheel over time.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the equations governing the system. Some participants have suggested potential forms for the equations and have raised questions about dimensional consistency and the relationship between torque and power. There is no explicit consensus yet, as participants are still exploring various interpretations and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of known initial conditions, including angular velocity and frictional power loss. There is a noted discrepancy in the expected time for the wheel to come to a stop, prompting further investigation into the equations being used.

Mamed
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello

I need to find a an equation that describes the rundown of a wheel as function of the time.
The wheel is running at an constant speed and is then disconnected and runs down to standstill.

We know what the angular velocity of the wheel is at time 0, Wm. We know the inertia, J. with this we can calculate the kinetic energy in the wheel at time 0 as

E = J * Wm^2 / 2

Now we also now the Friction losses in kW at the constant speed, Pfr at time 0.

What i want to know is how to combine these. I know that the frictional losses are subtracted somehow from the kinetic energy but i down now where to start.

Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello. Can you determine the torque due to friction from the initial frictional power loss, Pfr, and the initial angular speed ωm?
 
Yes these two things are know and given. The wheel is running at the grid network of 50Hz and at that speed Pfr is known and constant.

I think that the friction losses are decreased with the angular frequency to the power of 2 or 3 but i am not really sure on this.

Ie

Pfr(w) = Pfr0 * w^3
 
Mamed said:
Yes these two things are know and given. The wheel is running at the grid network of 50Hz and at that speed Pfr is known and constant.

I think that the friction losses are decreased with the angular frequency to the power of 2 or 3 but i am not really sure on this.

Ie

Pfr(w) = Pfr0 * w^3

This equation is inconsistent with dimensions. Maybe it should be written P = bωn where b is a constant and the exponent n is 2 or 3. You should be able to write the constant b in terms of the initial frictional power loss Po and the initial rate of spin ωo.

It looks like this will require some calculus in order to determine how ω changes with time. Do you see how to relate P and E using a derivative?
 
Sorry its more P_{fr} = P_{fr_0} (\frac{w}{w_0})^3

If we look at Newtons second equation we have

<br /> \frac{}{}<br /> J * \frac{dw}{dt} + kw = 0<br />

it gives that

<br /> \frac{dw}{dt} + \frac{k}{J}w = 0<br />

if we set the solution as w * e^{(k*t /J )} we get

<br /> \frac{d}{dt}w * e^{(k*t /J )} + \frac{k}{J}w * e^{(k*t /J )} = 0<br />

solving this for w * e^{(k*t /J )} we will have an solution as

w(t) = w(0) * e^{(k*t /J )} but i don't know how i should link ##k## and ##Pfr##.

All i want is to graf w(t), that is that the speed is decreasing with time due to friction losses.
 
Mamed said:
Sorry its more P_{fr} = P_{fr_0} (\frac{w}{w_0})^3

OK, so we can write ##P_{fr} = P_{fr_0} (\frac{w}{w_0})^3 = aw^3## where ##a = \frac{P_{fr_0}}{w_0^3}##

If we look at Newtons second equation we have

<br /> J * \frac{dw}{dt} + kw = 0<br />

How did you get the torque ##\tau## to be ##kw##? The magnitude of the torque is related to the power as ##P_{fr} = \tau w##. Use ##P_{fr} = aw^3## to discover how the torque depends on ##w##.
 
TSny said:
OK, so we can write ##P_{fr} = P_{fr_0} (\frac{w}{w_0})^3 = aw^3## where ##a = \frac{P_{fr_0}}{w_0^3}##



How did you get the torque ##\tau## to be ##kw##? The magnitude of the torque is related to the power as ##P_{fr} = \tau w##. Use ##P_{fr} = aw^3## to discover how the torque depends on ##w##.

Ok if we do that we will get an equation a standard solution that looks something like

##\frac{d\omega}{dt} = -a\omega^3## -> ##\frac{d\omega}{\omega^3} = -adt ##

##\omega(t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2at + C_1}} ## where ##C_1 = \omega(0) = 1/w_0 ##

And if i plot this as a fuction of time i will get a rolldown time of seconds while it should take minutes. So i looked at the dimensions of the Newtons equation and they are not the same :/ should there be another term to make sure that they are the same dimensions?

KR
 
The frictional power is the rate at which the energy is decreasing due to friction: ##P = -dE/dt ##.

What differential equation do you get if you substitute ##P = aw^3## and ##E = \frac{1}{2} J w^2##?
 
Ok so ##dE/dt + P = 0## as ##dE/dt## has dimension Joule/s which is the same as Watt.

So what we will have is

##\frac{d\omega^2J}{dt2} + a\omega^3 = 0##

(not sure if I am doing the next step correct or not) but if we take away one ##\omega## on each side we will get

##\frac{d\omega}{dt}*\frac{J}{2} + a\omega^2 = 0 ##

and if we solve this we will get

## \omega(t) = \frac{\omega_0}{2*P_{fr0}/J\omega_0 + 1} ##

am i doing this correctly?
 
  • #10
Careful with the factors of 2. Note that ##\frac{d}{dt}\omega^2 = 2\omega\frac{d\omega}{dt}##. So, ##\frac{dE}{dt} = \frac{1}{2}J\frac{d}{dt}\omega^2 = J\omega\frac{d\omega}{dt}##.

After you set up ##P = -\frac{dE}{dt}##, separate variables and integrate to find ##\omega(t)##.

[Note that your result ## \omega(t) = \frac{\omega_0}{2*P_{fr0}/J\omega_0 + 1} ## doesn't make sense because your right hand side doesn't depend on time. You know that ##\omega## should decrease with time.]
 
  • #11
TSny said:
Careful with the factors of 2. Note that ##\frac{d}{dt}\omega^2 = 2\omega\frac{d\omega}{dt}##. So, ##\frac{dE}{dt} = \frac{1}{2}J\frac{d}{dt}\omega^2 = J\omega\frac{d\omega}{dt}##.

After you set up ##P = -\frac{dE}{dt}##, separate variables and integrate to find ##\omega(t)##.

[Note that your result ## \omega(t) = \frac{\omega_0}{2*P_{fr0}/J\omega_0 + 1} ## doesn't make sense because your right hand side doesn't depend on time. You know that ##\omega## should decrease with time.]

Sorry forgot the ##t## there in the nominator. There is supposed to be a ##t## there like this.

## \omega(t) = \frac{\omega_0}{2*P_{fr0}*t/J\omega_0 + 1}##
 
  • #12
Mamed said:
Sorry forgot the ##t## there in the nominator. There is supposed to be a ##t## there like this.

## \omega(t) = \frac{\omega_0}{2*P_{fr0}*t/J\omega_0 + 1}##

OK. After correcting for the factor of 2, I think there's still an error in part of your expression where you have the ratio ##P_{fr0}*t/J\omega_0##. Check to make sure you have the correct exponent on the ##\omega_0## here.
 
  • #13
Ok this is how i have reasoned when looking at this.

##\frac{dE}{dt} + P = 0 ##

we know how the equation is set up

##E = \frac{J\omega^2}{2}; P = \frac{P_{fr0}}{\omega_0^3}*\omega^3 → a * \omega^3##

we replace E and P with their dependency of ##\omega## and cross out one ##\omega## on each side, it is this step that I am am hesitant on whether you can really do this

##\frac{J}{2}\frac{d\omega^2}{dt} + a*\omega^3 = 0 → \frac{J}{2}\frac{d\omega^{2→1}}{dt} + a*\omega^{3→2} = 0 → \frac{J}{2}\frac{d\omega}{dt} + a*\omega^2 = 0##

simplify a bit

## \frac{d\omega}{dt} + \frac{2*a}{J}*\omega^2 = 0## call ##\frac{2*a}{J}## for ##\alpha##

## \frac{d\omega}{dt} + \alpha*\omega^2 = 0##

move over to the other side

## \frac{d\omega}{dt} = -\alpha*\omega^2##

## \frac{d\omega}{\omega^2} = -\alpha*dt##

integrate

## ∫\omega^{-2}d\omega = -\alpha*∫dt##

## -\omega^{-1} = -\alpha*t + C##

change singes

## +\omega^{-1} = +\alpha*t - C##

## \omega(t) = \frac{1}{\alpha*t - C}##

where we find the constant

##\omega(0) = \omega_0##

## \omega(0) = \frac{1}{0 - C} → C = -1/\omega_0##

giving us

## \omega(t) = \frac{1}{\alpha*t 1/\omega_0}##

if we multiply with \omega_0 / \omega_0 on both sides we will have

## \omega(t) = \frac{1}{\alpha*t + 1/\omega_0} * \frac{\omega_0}{\omega_0}##

## \omega(t) = \frac{\omega_0}{\omega_0\alpha*t + 1} ##

if we substitute the ##\alpha## with what is has been then we will get

$$ \omega(t) = \frac{\omega_0}{\frac{2P_{fr0}*t}{J*\omega_0} + 1} $$

the problem is that with

## P_{fr0} = 170 000 watt ##
## w_0 = \pi * 50 ## ( 4 pole machine)
## J = 4000 kgm^2 ##
## t = seconds ##

we will get a decrease that is too fast. The slowdown should take around one hour when it takes minutes. If however we put the power in kW instead of W then rate is much closer to the reality though in this case it more the other way around as it takes 2x longer.
 
  • #14
As noted earlier, ##\frac{d}{dt} \omega^2 = 2\omega \frac{d\omega}{dt}##. So ##\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{1}{2}J\omega^2) = J\omega \frac{d\omega}{dt}##. (The 2's have cancelled.)

Then, $$\alpha = \frac{a}{J} = \frac{P_{0fr}}{J \omega_0^3}$$ Note that ##\omega_0## is raised to the third power here.

When you substitute this into ##\omega(t) = \frac{\omega_0}{\omega_0 \alpha t +1}##, you end up with $$\omega(t) = \frac{\omega_0}{\frac{P_{0fr}}{J \omega_0^2}t +1}$$

So, you have the square of ##\omega_0## in the denominator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K