Rust and Pathogens: Quality Control Risk in Food Industry

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rust
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the risks associated with rusty metal in the food industry, particularly focusing on its potential as a pathogen risk. Participants explore various aspects including microbiological implications, the challenges of disinfecting rusted surfaces, and the connection between rust and specific bacteria such as Clostridium tetani. The conversation touches on both theoretical and practical concerns related to food safety and quality control.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern about rusty metal harboring Tetanus bacteria and the implications for food safety if it were to come into contact with skin or food.
  • One participant clarifies that Tetanus is caused by a bacterium, not a virus, and speculates that rust may increase the availability of iron, potentially promoting bacterial growth.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that disinfecting rusted metal is challenging due to its porous nature, which can harbor bacteria away from disinfectants.
  • Some participants note that while rust may imply a dirty environment, not all rusted surfaces necessarily pose a contamination risk, particularly if they are maintained properly.
  • There is mention of Microbially Induced Corrosion (MIC) as a concern related to bacterial colonies affecting metal integrity.
  • One participant shares personal experiences with metallic flavors in food cooked in cast-iron, raising questions about the safety of consuming food exposed to rusted surfaces.
  • Another participant humorously suggests that food could be labeled as iron-fortified if cooked with rusted metal.
  • Some participants discuss the broader implications of rust in various contexts, including plant pathogens, indicating a diverse interpretation of the term "rust."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the risks associated with rusty metal, with multiple competing views on its implications for food safety and the presence of pathogens. Some express concern while others suggest that the risks may be overstated.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the topic, including the microbiological aspects of rust and its interaction with food safety protocols. There are references to specific bacteria and the conditions under which rust may or may not pose a risk, but no definitive conclusions are drawn.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
Working in the food industry and quality control people can not tell me why rusty metal is all ways put down as a pathogen risk, what is this risk please.

Edit.
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
The biggest risk that comes to mind; rusty metal is known to harbour Tetanus bacteria*, so if you should cut your skin on a piece of "rusty metal", it is a good idea to check your tetanus immunization and if needed, get a booster shot. If there was rusty metal in my food, I would be concerned about it tearing some skin on its journey to my stomach. :bugeye:*tetanus bacterium: Clostridium tetani, anaerobic bacillus, produces the neurotoxin tetanospasmin. Thanks ian for catching my oversight on category of microorganism.
 
Last edited:
Ouabache said:
Tetanus virus

Tetanus is a toxin produce by a bacterium not a virus. Being a microbiologist, the difference is important.

For rusting iron, it probably has to do with iron availability for bacteria and other pathogen. Virtually all bacteria requires iron and they need to get it from somewhere. One way to limit bacterial grow, which reduces pathogen/spoilage risk, is to remove or reduce accessibility to freely available iron. Human do that with transferin, lactoferrin and haem. Changes in iron availability will greatly impact how a pathogen grow, so rusting iron might increase the amount of freely available iron in the environment and bacteria would grow much faster. This is, however, speculation on my part.
 
Thanks guys, i should have said that there is zero possibility of this rust getting into any food product, it seems to be iansmiths suggestion that rust is a possible feeding area,that is the cause.
 
Another reason is simply the challenge of disinfecting something as porous as rusted metal since there are lots of nooks and crannies for the bacteria to hide in away from the disinfectants you're cleaning it with. Sand it down and give it a coat of paint and folks are happy that it's again a non-porous surface that can be properly disinfected.
 
Moonbear said:
Another reason is simply the challenge of disinfecting something as porous as rusted metal since there are lots of nooks and crannies for the bacteria to hide in away from the disinfectants you're cleaning it with. Sand it down and give it a coat of paint and folks are happy that it's again a non-porous surface that can be properly disinfected.
Yes, but I've never heard of any other common warning about tetanus except rust.

I've always wondered what the connection was. Now I know.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Yes, but I've never heard of any other common warning about tetanus except rust.

Actually, it's any deep puncture wound. The rust in those cases usually implies a dirty surface...something old, lying around a long time. You'd want a tetanus booster if you got any sort of deep puncture wound, such as an animal bite, not just the proverbial rusty nail. It's an anaerobic bacteria, so can thrive deep in those wounds.
 
wolram said:
Thanks guys, i should have said that there is zero possibility of this rust getting into any food product, it seems to be iansmiths suggestion that rust is a possible feeding area,that is the cause.

I believe that would be Micobially Induced Corrosion (MIC) as well. A bacterial colony's biofilm and associated exudations can cause the underlying metal to corrode. It could even be galvanic corrosion from differential aeration due to the overlying biofilm.
 
Last edited:
chemisttree said:
I believe that would be Micobially Induced Corrosion (MIC) as well. A bacterial colony's biofilm and associated exudations can cause the underlying metal to corrode. It could even be galvanic corrosion from differential aeration due to the overlying biofilm.

Thanks all, i guess i should not moan about the cost of constantly replacing rusty hardwear.
MoonB, painting parts is frowned upon, we can get away with it in extreme cases.
 
  • #10
On the other hand, food exposed to rusty (oxidized) metal, may not necessarily, be harmful (ref: scientist's opinion) . I've tasted a metallic flavor when I cooked chili in a cast-iron dutch oven (lesson: don't cook anything acidic in cast-iron), and also in breads or cake baked in a pan with small amount of oxidation on its surface.
 
  • #11
You'd just have to label it all iron-fortified! :biggrin: (Though, it would defeat the purpose if it's calcium-fortified too.)
 
  • #12
Rusty iron or steel is usually associated with a moist and dirty environment, hence the concern that rust would also mean bacterial contaminiation. Certainly a rusty nail on the ground or in a rotten piece of wood outdoors would likely have bacteria such as Clostridium tetani resident.

Rust films are porous and can absorb moisture, so could conceivably become breeding grounds for bacteria. On the other hand, a cast iron pot with a little rust which develops if the pot is washed in water (usually with soap), dried in the dish rack, and then stored in a clean, dry cabinet would likely not have bacteria in the rust. Nevertheless, wash it or even heat it before use.

As Ouabache indicated, it might change the taste of the food.

Interesting, MIC can occur in certain stainless steels, which have an increased sulfur content. These are usually anaerobic bacteria however.
 
  • #13
Iron oxides can affect food colors, as well as taste.
 
  • #14
The title of this thread is an attention getter. What is the first thing that comes to mind, when you see "rust and pathogen" in the same phrase?

The ubiquitous rust diseases of course. If, by chance you want to take a closer look at some rusts, there is an extensive http://www.btny.purdue.edu/Herbaria/Arthur/ at Purdue Univ, with 100,000 rust specimens (the largest collection of Uredinales in the world). I recall a fellow there, who made regular trips to South America (early 1980s) to collect specimens in the wild, before many areas of plant (and fungal) diversity were destroyed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
Ouabache said:
The title of this thread is an attention getter. What is the first thing that comes to mind, when you see "rust and pathogen" in the same phrase?

The ubiquitous rust diseases of course. If, by chance you want to take a closer look at some rusts, there is an extensive http://www.btny.purdue.edu/Herbaria/Arthur/ at Purdue Univ, with 100,000 rust specimens (the largest collection of Uredinales in the world). I recall a fellow there, who made regular trips to South America (early 1980s) to collect specimens in the wild, before many areas of plant (and fungal) diversity were destroyed.

I think only a mycologist, or maybe plant scientist, would think of that first. :biggrin: Most of us think rusty nail and tetanus.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
10K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K