Rusty - fill in missing steps, please

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yoss
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a geometry problem involving a parabola defined by the equation \(y^2 = 2x\) and its parametric representation. Participants are focused on finding the gradient of the chord connecting two points on the parabola, represented by parameters \(t_1\) and \(t_2\), and clarifying the steps involved in deriving the gradient formula.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the derivation of the gradient formula \(m = \frac{t_1 - t_2}{\frac{1}{2}(t_1^2 - t_2^2)} = \frac{2}{t_1 + t_2}\) and requests clarification on the steps involved.
  • Another participant suggests using the identity \(a^2 - b^2 = (a - b)(a + b)\) to understand the transformation from the first to the second fraction.
  • There is a discussion about the formatting of the LaTeX tags, with participants pointing out issues with extra characters and the visual presentation of the equations.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the necessity of using curly braces in the LaTeX formatting, with one participant noting that while they are not required, they improve the appearance of the equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical identity used to simplify the gradient formula, but there is no consensus on the formatting preferences for LaTeX tags. The discussion remains focused on clarifying steps rather than resolving any overarching disagreements.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the correct use of LaTeX formatting, indicating a potential limitation in their understanding of how to properly present mathematical expressions in the forum.

Yoss
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I'm taking a high level Geometry course, and as it turns out, I'm a tad out of touch on at least one basic aspect learned years passed.

Parabola with equation [tex]y^2 = 2x[/tex], and parametric equation [tex]x = \frac{1}{2}t^2, y = t (t \in \Re)[/tex] etc.

The problem is concered with finding the equation of the chord that joins the distinct points P and Q on the parabola w/ parameters [tex]t_1[/tex] and [tex]t_2[/tex] respectively, etc.

No that much of that was relevant to my quandray, which is in finding the gradient of PQ.
[tex]m = \frac{t_1 - t_2}{{\frac{1}{2}(t_1^2 - t_2^2)} = \frac{2}{t_1 + t_2} [\tex]<br /> edit: sorry, I guess I didn't get that tex tag right (what is wrong with it? Can I nest fractions like that?)<br /> <br /> m = (t1 - t2)/[.5(t1^2 - t2^2)] = 2/(t1 + t2).I can't remember (if I had learned it that is) how they arrived from the first to the latter fraction. <br /> <br /> An explanation would be quite welcome, thanks.[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you asking why:

[tex]\frac{t_1-t_2}{\frac{1}{2} ({t_1}^2-{t_2}^2)}=\frac{2}{t_1+t_2}[/tex]

? If so, remember that [itex]a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)[/itex]. And you can click on the equation above to see how I got it working. I think you have an extra {.
 
StatusX said:
Are you asking why:

[tex]\frac{t_1-t_2}{\frac{1}{2} ({t_1}^2-{t_2}^2)}=\frac{2}{t_1+t_2}[/tex]

? If so, remember that [itex]a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)[/itex]. And you can click on the equation above to see how I got it working. I think you have an extra {.


Thanks, I guess I wasn't looking at it the right way.

Did you need the {'s around each t in the denominator?
 
Yoss said:
Did you need the {'s around each t in the denominator?

No, but it makes it look nicer. {...}^2 puts the two above and to the right of the whole expression. If you just wrote t_1^2, you get some looks like a tensor element:

[tex]{t_1}^2[/tex] vs [tex]t_1^2[/tex]
 
Yoss, your last equation... you used a backslash to close the tex tag is all you got wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K