Mr Bean
- 1
- 0
Can anyone explain why there is an inverse relationship between target to detector distance and scattering angle?
Thanks.
Thanks.
The discussion centers around the inverse relationship between target-to-detector distance and scattering angle in the context of Rutherford scattering. Participants explore the suitability of alpha particles compared to beta particles for this experiment, touching on aspects of scattering, penetrating power, and energy considerations.
Participants express varying views on the reasons for the preference of alpha particles over beta particles, with some agreeing on the factors of mass and energy while others explore different aspects of scattering and interaction. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall implications of these factors.
Participants reference specific concepts such as impact parameter and distance of closest approach, indicating a reliance on definitions and theoretical frameworks that may not be universally agreed upon.
Beta particles are very easily deflected (scattered) by electrons in the target, while the alpha particles are deflected only by the heavy nuclei. Furthermore, there are no radioactive sources that emit betas with fixed energy (because the decay energy is shared with anti-neutrinos), while radioactive alpha emitters emit fixed energy alphas.adil0311 said:hii.. i would like to know why alpha particles are more suited for this experiment than beta particles?
The penetrating power of a charged particle is proportional to ½Mv2/Zz where ½Mv2 is the projectile kinetic energy (in MeV) and Zz are the charges of the target and projectile. The kinetic energy of alpha particles is several times larger than betas, and the alpha particle z is twice the beta z. There is also an effect due to the sign of the projectile charge.adil0311 said:I was also thinking in terms of penetrating power of the beta particle since it is much less massive than the alpha particle. It could be that beta particle will not pass through the atom so easily. Does that make any sense?