Rutherford Scattering, relativistic

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the relativistic correction to the differential scattering cross section for 100 MeV electrons interacting with gold (Au) nuclei. The relativistic correction formula is given as [1 - (v0)²/c².sin²(θ/2)], where E0 is 0.511 MeV. The user attempts to derive the velocity (v) from kinetic energy but is advised against using non-relativistic approximations. Instead, the correct approach involves solving for v/c using the equation E = E0 / √(1 - (v/c)²).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics concepts
  • Familiarity with differential scattering cross section
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy equations
  • Basic grasp of electron interactions with atomic nuclei
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of relativistic kinetic energy equations
  • Learn about the implications of relativistic corrections in scattering experiments
  • Explore the concept of scattering cross section in particle physics
  • Investigate the behavior of electrons at relativistic speeds
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on particle physics, relativistic mechanics, and nuclear interactions.

Physser
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Asked to calculate the relativistic correction, to the differential scattering cross section which is given by the equation below in terms of E, E0 and θ where E0= .511 MeV.
with 100MeV electrons from an Au nuclei at certain angles θ.

Homework Equations



Relativistic correction = [ 1 - (v0)2/c2.sin2(θ/2)]

The Attempt at a Solution


I figure the electron energy is kinetic so 100MeV = 1/2 m v2

and by re-arranging for v i get; v = 200/E0

then plugging into the formula for v gives, (at 20°=θ)

[1 - 200/E0c2.0.03 ]

I'm not sure, first of all if this is correct do far and second of all how to express in terms of E, could it be to use;

E = √(1-(v/c)2).mc2 and somehow re-arrange?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physser said:
I figure the electron energy is kinetic so 100MeV = 1/2 m v2

It's not appropriate at all to use the non-relativistic approximation for kinetic energy here.

I think you should try to solve v/c from
E = \frac{E_0}{ \sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K