S: Thrust vs Gravity & F22 Raptor

  • Thread starter Thread starter AstroNOT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Thrust
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The F22 Raptor has a thrust-to-weight ratio of approximately 2:1, allowing it to perform vertical climbs and hover maneuvers. However, this thrust ratio cannot continuously overcome gravity, which exerts an acceleration of 9.8 m/s². As altitude increases, the diminishing oxygen levels significantly reduce engine output and combustion efficiency, ultimately affecting thrust and limiting the aircraft's ability to accelerate beyond 70,000 feet. Understanding acceleration in terms of gravity is crucial, as the Raptor can achieve 2 g's of acceleration but is constrained by air resistance at high speeds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thrust-to-weight ratio in aviation
  • Basic knowledge of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the principles of aerodynamics
  • Concept of acceleration measured in meters per second squared (m/s²)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of altitude on jet engine performance
  • Study the principles of thrust and drag in aerodynamics
  • Learn about the physics of vertical flight and hover capabilities
  • Explore the concept of escape velocity and its implications for aircraft
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, aviation enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the mechanics of high-performance aircraft like the F22 Raptor.

AstroNOT
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The F22 raptor has an approximate 2:1 thrust to weight ratio. It can climb vertically and stand on its tail in a hover.

Vertical acceleration is given by: Thrust - Drag - Weight = mass * acceleration (aka gravity). The opposing force to thrust involves an acceleration due to the force of gravity which is roughly equal to 9.8 m/s/s. So a 2:1 thrust ratio, though fun, cannot overcome the force of gravity i.e. accelerate continually -- in which case the craft would reach escape velocity which is in excess of 11 km/s or in the vicinity of mach10.​

Please advise about any misinformation here. As well as the mechanics that keep this craft from accelerating beyond 70k feet. How does one conceptualize per second per second acceleration? Distance per second is conceivable. Acceleration is observable. But the designation escapes me.

Thanks for any advice.
AstroNOT
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That paragraph doesn't make a whole lot of sense. At a 2:1 thrust ratio, a plane will accelerate vertically until drag slows the acceleration and then will decelerate as the engines lose thrust at high altitude.

I'm not sure I understand your question in the last part. m/s/s is the units of acceleration.
 
At the very least, it shouldn't really be too hard to concieve of the units of acceleration. Meters per second per second means how many (meters per second) it gains every second.
 
Acceleration is the change of velocity per second. For example in the case of gravity, acceleration indicates a change in velocity of 32 ft/sec each second.

For constant vertical acceleration, the jet aircraft would require constant atmosphere. As the aircraft climbs, the presence of oxygen diminishes and dramatically affects engine output. Combustion efficiency depends on cool dense atmosphere. High altitude flight affects turbine engines and decreases thrust, altering the thrust to weight ratio and acceleration.
 
Conceptionalise acceleration in terms of gravity. For example, you might say the raptor has 2 g's of acceleration. It can overcome the force of gravity (which means to hover), it just can't overcome the force of air resistance pressing against it at a few times the speed of sound or beyond. Also, it can't fly without the atmosphere, which (ignoring limited fuel supplies) is the only reason helicopters can't just slowly inch their way to outer space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K