Safe speeds in roller coasters

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of safe speeds for roller coasters, exploring the physics involved, particularly the transition of potential energy to kinetic energy and the forces experienced by riders. Participants consider various factors that influence safety, including design considerations, g-forces, and passenger vulnerability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the definition of "safe" speed, suggesting that safety is influenced by multiple variables and is typically addressed by engineers during design.
  • One participant notes that while roller coaster speeds are generally low, tight curves can increase g-forces, which must be managed to prevent excessive tilting.
  • Concerns are raised about vibrations, structural integrity, and maintenance as critical factors in roller coaster safety, with a claim that most accidents are due to mechanical failure rather than design flaws.
  • Another participant emphasizes that people are more fragile than the coasters themselves, suggesting that design g-forces are typically low and manageable for passengers.
  • Statistics regarding injuries from roller coasters are mentioned, with a participant arguing that claims for whiplash may not accurately reflect the dangers of fairground rides.
  • Some participants express that roller coasters could be designed to be safe at various speeds, but the limitations often come from the passengers' tolerance to g-forces.
  • Discussion includes the relevance of short-duration g-forces during transitions and how they can affect comfort and safety.
  • Personal anecdotes about experiences on roller coasters and other high-g activities are shared, highlighting individual perceptions of thrill and risk.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on what constitutes a safe speed for roller coasters. There are multiple competing views regarding the factors influencing safety, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the specific calculations or equations that could define safe speeds, and there are references to the complexity of safety considerations beyond just speed.

Lili123
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
From my research and understanding of roller coasters, their speed is mainly impacted by the force of gravity and it works on the basis of potential energy build up into kinetic energy. Therefore, my question surrounds the idea of safe speeds on coasters. Because a roller coaster car is only impacted by gravity, what is a safe speed and how might it be calculated? Is there an equation for this?
I have researched online and have yet to find any information regarding this topic.

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is unclear what you mean by "safe" speed. Roller coaster safety depends on many variables and a roller coaster will generally be constructed by competent engineers taking safety into account.
 
The speeds of roller coasters are never very high. You must have done the sums. The danger is when you take a coaster and make it turn through tight curves, which increases the g forces (a = v2/r). The design needs to keep the forces directed down between the tracks - to avoid too much tilting. But there is a major issue with vibrations, structural strength and maintenance. Afaik, all accidents can be attributed to mechanical failure / maintenance and not the basic designs. (As long as people stay in their seats, of course)
 
People are more fragile than coasters.
 
CWatters said:
People are more fragile than coasters.
Oh yes, very much so. But the design g forces are pretty minute and even the speeds are pretty low. When there is no malfunction, they are surprisingly gentle with the passengers. I remember the fairground man walking around on the wavy platform of the "Waltzer" and casually taking our fares whilst we were quietly bricking it and holding on with white knuckles. He would spin the kidney shaped cars and make the girls scream with his ciggy in the corner of his mouth and a smooth grin on his lips, leaning into the centre spindle. (He will be 80+ years old by now. lol.)
 
sophiecentaur said:
Oh yes, very much so. But the design g forces are pretty minute and even the speeds are pretty low.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paralysed-teen-suing-gullivers-world-6804700

Paralysed teen suing Gulliver's World after she claims whiplash from Antelope ride injured spinal cord

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16271559

Significant spinal injury resulting from low-level accelerations: a case series of roller coaster injuries.

It is estimated that there were a total of 656 neck and back injuries during the study period, and 39 were considered significant by the study inclusion criteria.
 
Last edited:
People make insurance claims for whiplash after the mildest road traffic shunts so looking for statistics of fairground injuries could give biased results.
But at least a car journey can usually be serving some purpose. Fairground rides are not compulsory and never serve any other purpose than to provide excitement. They look much more dangerous for most passengers than they really are (for most passengers). However, there will be people whose susceptibility to whiplash lies outside the normal range. A ride that's designed to keep everyone totally safe would have to be along the lines of a normal public transport ride. You can break a vertebra by doing loosening excercises.
People play rough sports and do rock climbing. They get injured. I question whether they are in any position to complain - assuming reasonable care has been taken. "Reasonable" care cannot exclude the possibility of injury.
It is easy to avoid fairground injuries - just stand (well back) and watch.
 
Agreed. My point is that a roller coaster could probably be made structurally safe at virtually any speed or g-loading, It's the passengers that would be the limiting factor.

I've ridden a few coaster and done aerobatics in small aircraft. On a coaster the g-forces due to bends and loops have always been modest but on one or two the short duration g-forces due to uneven track (?) were somewhat uncomfortable.
 
SO we are singing from the same hymn sheet. That's always good.
Addressing the OP then. The fact is that you don't need excessive g forces if you want to provide an exciting ride but you do need to eliminate short duration g forces which can happen on transitions. These would be easy to neglect in an initial design. Rocking and fast tipping could do damage (like with bad driving).
Answer - there is no short answer. haha
 
  • #10
CWatters said:
On a coaster the g-forces due to bends and loops have always been modest but on one or two the short duration g-forces due to uneven track (?) were somewhat uncomfortable.
This is a case where the rate of acceleration change (jerk) becomes relevant.
 
  • #11
CWatters said:
I've ridden a few coaster and done aerobatics in small aircraft
Wing walking, too? :biggrin:
My biggest thrill was on my first parachute jump and it was from a De Haviland Rapide - a two engined biplane. You did the jump from a standing position on the lower wing (two suitable handles on the top wing). Only a few seconds to appreciate it and contemplate mortality then let go and a high g shock to the groin as the static like pulled you upwards by the harness to deploy the canopy. Then there was the high g landing. A really stupid thing to do, but young men in particular are attracted to that sort of thing.
 
  • #12
sophiecentaur said:
Wing walking, too? :biggrin:
My biggest thrill was on my first parachute jump and it was from a De Haviland Rapide - a two engined biplane. You did the jump from a standing position on the lower wing (two suitable handles on the top wing). Only a few seconds to appreciate it and contemplate mortality then let go and a high g shock to the groin as the static like pulled you upwards by the harness to deploy the canopy. Then there was the high g landing. A really stupid thing to do, but young men in particular are attracted to that sort of thing.

Speak for yourself. I for one, avoid high G shocks to the groin. :kiss:
 
  • #13
anorlunda said:
Speak for yourself. I for one, avoid high G shocks to the groin. :kiss:
They played down that bit during the preparation training. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K