Safeguarding UTP Cables in Elevator Shafts: Filtering Options

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of safeguarding UTP cables in elevator shafts, specifically focusing on filtering options for a device with multiple inputs that require signal conversion from higher voltage levels to TTL. Participants explore various filtering methods, signal integrity issues, and the implications of using UTP cables in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Misho proposes using a voltage divider and low-pass filter or possibly a transistor to convert 12 to 19V signals to TTL.
  • Some participants suggest using differential signaling with RS-485 transceivers, emphasizing the need for proper termination.
  • Misho clarifies that the communication is parallel, involving one UTP cable with multiple twisted pairs for different signals.
  • Concerns are raised about the inability to terminate the signal due to varying control boards and unknown source impedance.
  • Discussion includes the potential for ringing on signals due to uncontrolled transmission lines, with some participants noting that slow signal changes may mitigate this issue.
  • Participants discuss the implications of edge slew rates on signal integrity and the potential need for capacitors at inputs to smooth signals.
  • Concerns about safety standards for elevator electronics are mentioned, highlighting the risks of electrical fires.
  • A student participant expresses their struggle with high frequencies and active components, seeking to improve their understanding of the subject.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the best approach to filtering and signal integrity, with no consensus reached on a definitive solution. Concerns about safety and standards are also raised, indicating a shared apprehension but differing levels of expertise and confidence among participants.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the unknown characteristics of the driving source and the challenges posed by the elevator environment, which may affect signal integrity and safety.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for electronics students, engineers working with UTP cables in challenging environments, and those interested in signal processing and filtering techniques in digital circuits.

mishobg12
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am making a device with 8 INPUTs that will be connected to a long (5-25m) UTP cable running trough an elevator shaft (some interference, I imagine). Could you propose what kind of filters should I use on my inputs. The thing is, the HIGH level on these cables will be 12 to 19V but I need to convert them to TTL. I imagine some sort of voltage divider and low-pass filter. Or probably something with a transistor. I don't want to take any chances, though.
Thanks,
Misho
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
mishobg12 said:
Hi,
I am making a device with 8 INPUTs that will be connected to a long (5-25m) UTP cable running trough an elevator shaft (some interference, I imagine). Could you propose what kind of filters should I use on my inputs. The thing is, the HIGH level on these cables will be 12 to 19V but I need to convert them to TTL. I imagine some sort of voltage divider and low-pass filter. Or probably something with a transistor. I don't want to take any chances, though.
Thanks,
Misho

You should use differential signalling on the unshielded twisted pair (UTP). The easiest conversion would be to use RS-485 transceivers at the ends, and be sure to terminate each end in the Zo of the cable (probably around 100 Ohms).
 
Thanks for your answer, berkeman.
There is a problem, though. I guess I should have said that the communication is parallel. This does NOT depend on my device.
 
Last edited:
mishobg12 said:
Thanks for your answer, berkeman.
There is a problem, though. I guess I should have said that the communication is parallel. This does NOT depend on my device.

What do you mean by parallel? Are there 8 UTP cables for the 8 signals? Are you saying that you don't control the driving of the signals onto the UTP(s), but need to deal with receiving them and converting them to TTL? What is the driving source impedance and current capability? Will you be able to forward terminate the UTP(s)?
 
My device is an elevator display. One UTP cable has 4 twisted pairs = eight cables. every cable is connected to one of my inputs. They have a 5-bit binary number - a code for the respective symbol that should be displayed. The other tree are for the direction. There might be only one display, or there might be one at each stop. So I can't terminate the signal. I also must support different type of control boards (which output the signal) and I can't possibly know the source impedance. I must support a large diapason of characteristics.
 
mishobg12 said:
My device is an elevator display. One UTP cable has 4 twisted pairs = eight cables. every cable is connected to one of my inputs. They have a 5-bit binary number - a code for the respective symbol that should be displayed. The other tree are for the direction. There might be only one display, or there might be one at each stop. So I can't terminate the signal. I also must support different type of control boards (which output the signal) and I can't possibly know the source impedance. I must support a large diapason of characteristics.

What about power and ground? So you aren't using the UTP as transmission lines, just as individual conductors... Have you built a 25m setup in your lab yet to look at what ringing does at the display?
 
power is 19V stabilized to 5 with 7805 circuit.
I was planning just to use my best bet on the prototype and install it on a real elevator. Since it's a digital circuit it can't be that sensitive, right?
 
mishobg12 said:
power is 19V stabilized to 5 with 7805 circuit.
I was planning just to use my best bet on the prototype and install it on a real elevator. Since it's a digital circuit it can't be that sensitive, right?

The issue is ringing on the signals, caused by the uncontrolled tranmission line and inductance that the signals will see. If the rising and falling edges are slow enough, then ringing may not be a problem. If they are digital logic speed, then you will likely get enough ringing to cause data integrity issues. That's why transmission lines for sending data some distance are usually controlled impedance transmission lines, with appropriate terminations (forward-terminated, back-terminated, or doubly-terminated).
 
berkeman said:
If the rising and falling edges are slow enough, then ringing may not be a problem.

They are slow.. The signal only changes when the location (or direction) of the lift changes.
De facto, the minimum time in which the signal will not change is equal to the time in which the elevator travels trough one stop. This usually is as much as 4 seconds.
 
  • #10
mishobg12 said:
They are slow.. The signal only changes when the location (or direction) of the lift changes.
De facto, the minimum time in which the signal will not change is equal to the time in which the elevator travels trough one stop. This usually is as much as 4 seconds.

It's more the edge slew rates that I was referring to. Regular digital logic can have typical edges that transition in just a couple nanoseconds, and that will cause ringing on uncontrolled long lines. If the signals are latched by a clock signal, then the data that is latched can be wrong, depending on where the ringing lines up.

If the signals are not latched, then there should not be an issue.
 
  • #11
They are not latched. It really is very simple communication, because all of the work is done by the display itself.
So do I think I should put at least a capacitor in parallel to the input. And if yes, what value would you suggest?

I found what you said interesting, though.
http://prikachi.com/images/367/2373367y.png
Is something like this what you mean?
 
  • #12
I'm not understanding the graphs. Basically if you think of the Fourier transform of a pulse train with finite slew rate edges (not an ideal square wave), you will get harmonic content that depends on the sharpness of the edges (how short the rise and fall times are). That harmonic content can be a problem when the propagation time in the transmission line approaches the wavelength of the harmonics. So faster slew rates will give problems on unterminated/uncontrolled lines of shorter lengths.

As to a smoothing capacitor at each input, it wouldn't hurt. Use the output impedance of the drivers, and calculate your C value by setting the RC time constant around a millisecond or so for this application.
 
  • #13
Are there special standards for elevators?

An electrical fire in an elevator would be a disaster.

I would hate to ride in an elevator where the designer of some of the electrical components had to go to a website for electrical advice.
 
  • #14
hey, I am a student.
berkeman thank you for answering. I think I got it.
 
  • #15
mishobg12 said:
hey, I am a student.
berkeman thank you for answering. I think I got it.

So students are allowed to start fires? Ah, the good old days. I remember this one time... :eek:

:smile: Anyway, Carl's concerns are valid. You're at least using plenum-ratec cables, right?
 
  • #16
what I meant was I am NOT a professional :) high frequencies and active components have always been hard for me. I am not good with advanced math, maybe it's because of that. I'm focusing on digital electronics, but you always need to have some active components...

Since electronics books in my native language derive even the obvious things from a page-long equations, I started reading the Art of Electronics , which is as non-mathematical as it gets, but still I am not confident. Hope I'll just get it somehow
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
10K