Sakurai Problems - strange notation

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 5K views
Hargoth
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I'm just doing the Problems of Chapter 1 of Sakurai: Modern Quantum Mechanics. On page 60, problem 2 he writes:

"Suppose a 2x2 matrix X, (not necessary Hermitian, nor unitary) is written as

[itex]X = a_0 + \mathbf{\sigma \cdot a}[/itex],

where [itex]a_0[/itex] and [itex]a_{1,2,3}[/itex] are numbers."

which confuses me a bit, because you can't add a number and a matrix, and what is [itex]\sigma[/itex] anyway? Would be nice if someone knows what is meant by this (and tells me :biggrin: ).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dexter is correct. I was confused with this problem too and actually asked the same question about it here some time ago.
 
Thanks.:smile:

That [itex]\mathbf{\sigma}[/itex] is one of the Pauli-Matrices seems strange to me from the context of the book, because he never defined this during the first chapter. Nevertheless, I'll try to figure it out this way.
 
I think you're just supposed to take the sigmas abstractly as some 2x2 (complex-valued) matrices such that any 2x2 (complex-valued) matrix can be written as

[itex]X = a_0 I + \mathbf{\sigma \cdot a}[/itex]

with no assumptions about the form of the [itex]\mathbf{\sigma}[/itex]s. In math speak, the [itex]\mathbf{\sigma}[/itex]s together with [itex]I[/itex] are some basis for the vector space of 2x2 complex-valued matrices.
 
Last edited:
Eh, now that I try to actually do the problem, I think he (or the editor) is just assuming you know the Pauli matrices from undergrad QM.