Working with Hermitian-Adjoint - Sakurai Problem 1.4b

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjnartowt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sakurai
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Hermitian-adjoint operation in the context of Sakurai's Problem 1.4b, specifically addressing the incorrect application of the adjoint operation to matrix products. The user attempts to derive the adjoint of the product (XY) and mistakenly distributes the adjoint operation across scalars, leading to erroneous conclusions. The correct relationship is established as (XY)† = Y†X†, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the order of operations when dealing with matrix products in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with adjoint operations and their properties
  • Knowledge of matrix multiplication and its implications
  • Basic concepts of quantum state notation and completeness relations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of adjoint operations on matrix products
  • Explore completeness relations and their application in quantum mechanics
  • Review Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" for further examples and problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying linear algebra applications in physics, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Hermitian operators and adjoint operations.

bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Not relevant, but I have some work that reaches incorrect conclusions, and I can't see the mistake "in the middle".


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


\begin{array}{l}<br /> {(XY)^\dag } = {\left( {\left\langle {a&#039;} \right|X\left| {a&#039;&#039;} \right\rangle \left\langle {a&#039;&#039;} \right|Y\left| {a&#039;&#039;&#039;} \right\rangle } \right)^\dag } \\ <br /> = \left( {\left\langle {a&#039;} \right|X{{\left| {a&#039;&#039;} \right\rangle }^\dag }} \right)\left( {\left\langle {a&#039;&#039;} \right|Y{{\left| {a&#039;&#039;&#039;} \right\rangle }^\dag }} \right) \\ <br /> = \left( {\left\langle {a&#039;&#039;} \right|Y{{\left| {a&#039;&#039;&#039;} \right\rangle }^\dag }\left\langle {a&#039;} \right|X{{\left| {a&#039;&#039;} \right\rangle }^\dag }} \right) = {Y^\dag }{X^\dag } \\ <br /> \end{array}

...Somewhere, here, is a mistake. I distributed the adjoint operation "+" (dagger) across the two scalars, "<||>", but if I did that, this would imply:

{\left( {XY} \right)^\dag } = \left\langle {a&#039;} \right|X{\left| {a&#039;&#039;} \right\rangle ^\dag }\left\langle {a&#039;&#039;} \right|Y{\left| {a&#039;&#039;&#039;} \right\rangle ^\dag } = {X^\dag }{Y^\dag } = {\rm{uh - oh}}{\rm{.}}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first equality doesn't make sense to me.
when you expand out a matrix product you
should have a sum over a'',
and when you get rid of the sum (using completeness)
it tells you the correct order of the factors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K