Same string, different mass per unit length, whats the wavelength?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelength of a string composed of two materials with different mass per unit lengths (mu). The key equations involved are the wave speed equation, v = √(T/mu), and the wave equation, v = f * wavelength. The participants clarify that the tension (T) remains constant across both sections of the string, allowing for the determination of the wavelength on the right side using the known parameters from the left side. The correct approach involves solving for T on one side and applying it to find the wavelength on the other side.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and wave speed equations
  • Familiarity with mass per unit length (mu) and its implications
  • Basic knowledge of tension in strings and its role in wave propagation
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations for solving variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between tension and wave speed in strings
  • Learn how to derive the wave equation from fundamental principles
  • Explore the effects of varying mass per unit length on wave properties
  • Investigate the concept of frequency and its impact on wavelength calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics, as well as educators and tutors looking to clarify concepts related to wave propagation in strings with varying mass per unit lengths.

bobbo7410
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Same string, different mass per unit length, what's the wavelength?

*oddly I can't edit the original title?

Homework Statement



A string is made of two materials of different mass per unit length. On the left side of the string, the mpu is given as well as its wavelength. On the right only the mpu. The question asks for the right side's wavelength.

Homework Equations



xxx

The Attempt at a Solution



I immediately began doing just a simple balancing equations. 2.76/20.4 = 3.63X

yet it returned the answer as incorrect. How can that be??

as well, I thought maybe it was trick question since its all the same single string, the wavelength must be the same. so I put 20.4 and as well it returned it as incorrect.

I'm really not sure what I did wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How does the wavelength (or wave speed) depend on the mass per unit length?
 
Not sure if you were questioning me or you stating the problem variables don't depend on one another.

mu (mpl or mass per unit length) = string mass / string length

v = square root of (T / mu) where t = mg

thats all I can really find or think of regarding mu
 
bobbo7410 said:
v = square root of (T / mu) where t = mg
Good. The square root is key. That's what you were missing earlier.
 
? earlier all i had was a simply balanced equation that's it.

v = square root (T/mg) T being the period and mg being mass * gravity

I don't know T, or the mass.

perhaps you could break it down a little more basic for me.

Thanks for the help!
 
bobbo7410 said:
? earlier all i had was a simply balanced equation that's it.
Your balance equation was incorrect. Come up with a new one using the equation for wave speed.
v = square root (T/mg) T being the period and mg being mass * gravity
I thought we agreed that: v = square root (T/mu)
You don't need to know the tension, since it's the same for both sides of string.

Combine this with the "wave equation": v = f * wavelength. (Hint: The frequency is also the same for both sides.)
 
: ) thank you! that made it much simpler for me, I got it correct.

for some reason I looked back and the mu looked like mg.

So basically:

v = square root (T / mu)
v = f * wavelength

so [ f * wavelength = square root ( T / mu ) ]

I set the frequency to 1 for both so I only had 1 variable to determine. I solved for T on the left side of the string and once I found that I used that same T to determine the wavelength for the right side.

yey thanks doc
 
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1597041#post1597041

for my first equation.. Would it be beneficial to use the same setup as above to solve for frequency or T?

because if I were to find either of those I could easily find the velocity. yet I think am back where I started (2 unknown variables) since I can't simply substitute 1 for the frequency in that problem.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
42K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K