Sandwich Theorem proof lim (x,y) -> (0,0) (4x^3*y^4)/(3y^4+5x^8)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phyrrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the function (4x^3*y^4)/(3y^4+5x^8) as (x,y) approaches (0,0) is definitively zero. The discussion confirms that by substituting y=kx, the limit simplifies to zero as x approaches zero. The Sandwich Theorem is applied to establish that the limit can be bounded between two functions, leading to the conclusion that the limit is indeed zero. The participants emphasize the importance of using absolute values to ensure the lower limit is correctly evaluated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with the Sandwich Theorem
  • Knowledge of absolute value properties
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Sandwich Theorem in multivariable limits
  • Learn about the behavior of limits involving absolute values
  • Explore examples of limits approaching (0,0) in two-variable functions
  • Investigate the implications of substituting variables in limit calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on multivariable limits and the Sandwich Theorem, as well as anyone seeking to improve their understanding of limit proofs in mathematical analysis.

Phyrrus
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



lim (x,y) -> (0,0) (4x^3*y^4)/(3y^4+5x^8)

When y=kx -> lim x->0 = 0
The limit definitely is zero, but I can't prove it.

The Attempt at a Solution



? < lim (x,y) -> (0,0) (4x^3*y^4)/(3y^4+5x^8) < lim (x,y) -> (0,0) (4|x^3|*y^4+(15/4)|x^3|x^8)/(3y^4+5x^8) = (3/4)|x^3|

How do you find the lower limit of such a proof?
Can it be said that lim (x,y) -> (0,0) (4x^3*y^4)/(3y^4+5x^8) is equal to lim (x,y) -> (0,0) (|4x^3|*y^4)/(3y^4+5x^8) and therefore find the 'sandwich' of the new function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Your denominator is non-negative. If you drop the ##5x^8## from the denominator, the fraction will be larger in absolute value than it is now.
 
Thanks, that is quite a simple solution. However, what can I use for the smaller valued function? Seeing as there is an x^3 in the numerator, I can't use 0 for the lower limit.
 
Oh wait, I just need to put in a negative sign for the lower limit... it's late

Cheers mate
 
Phyrrus said:
Thanks, that is quite a simple solution. However, what can I use for the smaller valued function? Seeing as there is an x^3 in the numerator, I can't use 0 for the lower limit.

You can if you put absolute value signs around the whole fraction. Remember if the absolute value of something goes to zero, then the something does.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K