- #1
Adir_Sh
- 22
- 0
Hello.
Below I have a problem I can't quite understand to the full:
http://www.israup.net/images/027d25c3acde86a09bcb9e1ed869560a.png
http://www.israup.net/images/6757f5c30cbcfe051295b1b1e4614489.png
And that is the suggested solution:
http://www.israup.net/images/955a5be90466defb399d78c7693c8e2f.png
Now my question is about that [itex]g_{amp}[/itex] calculation in the solution provided in the solution manual for the book I'm solving from.
If [itex]P_{in}=35 dBW[/itex] and not 30 dBW as it is in the example, and also uplink frequency value changes from the example provided to the question, then how [itex]g_{amp}=18+144=162 dBW[/itex]? Shouldn't it be [itex]g_{amp}=18-103=-85 dBW[/itex]? -103dBW should reasonably be substracted (and not like 144 being added) since it stands for transmission loss, isn't it?
But the in Psat (out) it seems like they do compensate for it because they do add 162dB...
I have a strong feeling that I miss something here in the idea behind [itex]g_{amp}[/itex]. Could it gain the whole uplink loss in some way? I'm quite curious about that really... :uhh:
Thanks.
Below I have a problem I can't quite understand to the full:
http://www.israup.net/images/027d25c3acde86a09bcb9e1ed869560a.png
http://www.israup.net/images/6757f5c30cbcfe051295b1b1e4614489.png
And that is the suggested solution:
http://www.israup.net/images/955a5be90466defb399d78c7693c8e2f.png
Now my question is about that [itex]g_{amp}[/itex] calculation in the solution provided in the solution manual for the book I'm solving from.
If [itex]P_{in}=35 dBW[/itex] and not 30 dBW as it is in the example, and also uplink frequency value changes from the example provided to the question, then how [itex]g_{amp}=18+144=162 dBW[/itex]? Shouldn't it be [itex]g_{amp}=18-103=-85 dBW[/itex]? -103dBW should reasonably be substracted (and not like 144 being added) since it stands for transmission loss, isn't it?
But the in Psat (out) it seems like they do compensate for it because they do add 162dB...
I have a strong feeling that I miss something here in the idea behind [itex]g_{amp}[/itex]. Could it gain the whole uplink loss in some way? I'm quite curious about that really... :uhh:
Thanks.
Last edited by a moderator: