Scaling of the vertical projectile problem nondimensionalization

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the vertical projectile problem, specifically focusing on the nondimensionalization of the governing differential equation. Participants are tasked with restating the problem in a scaled form and exploring the implications of small parameters in the context of Taylor expansions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of nondimensionalizing the equation and express confusion regarding the scaling and the role of the small parameter. There are attempts to clarify the meaning of O(1) and O(e) in relation to Taylor expansions and the implications for the differential equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the series expansion of the terms in the differential equation and the interpretation of the order notation. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly apply these concepts to derive the desired solutions, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly scaling the nondimensional equation and the implications of the small parameter e, which is assumed to be much less than one. There is also mention of potential misunderstandings regarding the notation and terminology used in the problem statement.

reb659
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Restate the vertical projectile problem in a properly scaled form. (suppose x<<R).

d2x/dt^2=-g(R^2)/(x+R)^2

Initial conditions: x(0)=0, dx(0)/dt=VoFind the approximate solution accurate up to order O(1) and O(e), where r is a small dimensionless parameter. (i.e. the solution is given by a function f(e)).

Hint: Suppose 1/(1-e) is a term involving the small parameter e (i.e. e<<1) in the dimensionless equation, do the taylor expansion 1/(1-e)=1+e+...If we approximate 1(1-e) by 1 in the equation then we will obtain the O(1) solution, if we approximate 1/(1-e) by 1+e in the equation, we will obtain the O(e) solution.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I properly nondimensionalized the equation, getting the following:

d2y/dT^2=-K/(y+1)^2 where K = gR/Vo^2.

Now, as for the O(1) and O(e) stuff, I am completely baffled as to what the problem is asking for. Can someone please explain to me what exactly I am supposed to be doing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i think they want you to do a series expansion of 1/(y+1)^2, so you get something like

[tex]\frac{1}{(y+1)^2} = a + by + cy^2 +...[/tex]
where a, b & c are constants

the differential equation then becomes
[tex]\frac{d^2 y}{dT^2} = -\frac{K}{(y+1)^2} \approx -K(a + by + cy^2 +...)[/tex]

the O(1) case is equavalent to constant gravity, as it negelcts all term O(y) and above
[tex]\frac{d^2 y}{dT^2} = -\frac{K}{(y+1)^2} \approx -K(a) + O(y)[/tex]

the O(y) case includes the first order change, and neglects the terms O(y^2) and above
[tex]\frac{d^2 y}{dT^2} = -\frac{K}{(y+1)^2} \approx -K(a + by) + O(y^2)[/tex]

note this is possible because generally y<<1, so the contribution of y^n terms dcreases rapidly with increasing n
 
I actually redid the nondimensionalization part and it was correct, but not properly scaled which explains why I didn't get a term that was <<1. The correctly scaled nondimensional equation is d2Y/dT^2=-1/(1+eY)^2 where e<<1.

It doesn't really change though, I still don't see where the 1/(1-e) comes into play. When the problem statement says "the solution is given by a function f(e)", do they mean that O is a function of epsilon alone? I'm having trouble seeing what exactly O is - is it a solution Y to the differential equation or simply the right hand side of the differential equation after you taylor expand it?
 
Last edited:
i haven't checked with ur derivation of the differential equation... if ur happy with it, stick with it...

O actually means something about how one sequence "dominates" another... but i wouldn't bother going into it that far...

Though not exactly correct, I always just took "O" to mean order.. so if you cut off your sequence at O(1), that means the order of the terms neglected are of the order of x or O(x) ...

As x<<1, the order of x is << that of 1, simalarly O(x^2)<<O(x) and so on...
 
So O is just the order of the taylor approximation that replaces the right hand side?
 
Last edited:
Yep, so in my first post for the O(1) case, you neglect all terms O(y) and above... and so on
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K