# Scaling up the nucleus to the size of a pin.

• takando12
In summary, the conversation discusses the approximate size of an atom if the nucleus is scaled up to the size of a sharp pin's tip. The calculations result in a range of 1m, with a possible error of 0.5m. However, it is mentioned that the "order" of the size is more important and a precise value cannot be given due to the varying sizes of atoms and nuclei. The conclusion is that the size will be approximately 1m.
takando12

## Homework Statement

If the size of the nucleus ( in the range of 10-15m to 10-14m) is scaled up to the tip of a sharp pin, what roughly is the size of an atom ? Assume the tip of the pin to be in the range 10-5m to 10-4m

## The Attempt at a Solution

It's scaled up by a factor of 1010 i.e from 10-15m to 10-5m. And we also know that an atom's diameter is of the range 10-10 m, and so 10-10*1010 is 1 m. So if the nucleus is blown up to the size of a pin's tip, the size of the atom will be 1m right?
My textbook however says " Thus the nucleus of an atom is as small as the tip of a a sharp pin placed at the center of a sphere of radius 1 m. How is this ? The diameter of the sphere should be 1 m right? Where am i wrong in my logic?

Not necessarily a fallacy. You are asked for the "order" of the size, not the "exact" size. What this means that as long as you have approximately the right figure you're OK and is a useful check. You may have made an error mathematically or otherwise and calculated this as a kilometre, or a milimetre, for instance and this is what the calculation is designed to catch

sjb-2812 said:
Not necessarily a fallacy. You are asked for the "order" of the size, not the "exact" size. What this means that as long as you have approximately the right figure you're OK and is a useful check. You may have made an error mathematically or otherwise and calculated this as a kilometre, or a milimetre, for instance and this is what the calculation is designed to catch
I don't understand. Is the radius of the sphere 1 m or not? I don't see where the calculation error is.please help.

No error. It's approximately 1 metre, as opposed to 1 kilometre, or 1 millimetre.

sjb-2812 said:
No error. It's approximately 1 metre, as opposed to 1 kilometre, or 1 millimetre.
ok so if I hadn't seen the answer in my textbook and concluded that the radius of the sphere is 0.5 m , the answer is still fine right?

I would think so, but just rereading the question, are you assuming that the figures given are radius, or diameter for both figures (minor point)

sjb-2812 said:
I would think so, but just rereading the question, are you assuming that the figures given are radius, or diameter for both figures (minor point)
Diameter is what I assumed. I also checked for the diameter of an atom and it's indeed in the order of 10-10m and the diameter of the nucleus is 10-15m as well. So do they mean radius when they say "size" in the question? They got it wrong?

The "order" of something is an approximation. If given correct data you calculated the time it takes Usain Bolt to run 100m to be 0.1 seconds, 1 second, 10 seconds, 100 seconds, or 1000 seconds which is most likely to be correct?

But if you're taking both figures as diameter, where has the 0.5 come in?

takando12
sjb-2812 said:
The "order" of something is an approximation. If given correct data you calculated the time it takes Usain Bolt to run 100m to be 0.1 seconds, 1 second, 10 seconds, 100 seconds, or 1000 seconds which is most likely to be correct?

But if you're taking both figures as diameter, where has the 0.5 come in?
If we take both as diameters, then the 1 m I get after doing the multiplication must also be the diameter of the sphere with the pin in the middle right? And so in that case the radius must be 0.5m?

To state things mor bluntly: There is no one number which is a "correct" answer here. Atoms and nuclei come in many different sizes depending on the atomic number. As such you simply cannot give a precise value and bickering about 0.5 m vs 1 m is utterly pointless. Just as iff I ask you what the size of a boat is, you will not be able to answer 5.3 m. There are boats whicha are both much bigger and much smaller than this and thhe answer "of the order of 10 m" would be about as good as you could do.

takando12
So conclusion, I just say that it'll be in the order of 1 m. Period.

Yes, a factor of two is irrelevant when talking about orders of magnitude.

Edit: You might view order of magnitude computations as "what would be a good standard measure for x?"

takando12
Yes that makes sense, thank you all for the help.

## 1. Can the nucleus be scaled up to the size of a pin?

Currently, there is no technology or scientific method that can scale up the nucleus to the size of a pin. The nucleus is the smallest and most fundamental unit of matter, and its size is determined by the laws of physics and quantum mechanics.

## 2. What would happen if we were able to scale up the nucleus to the size of a pin?

If we were able to scale up the nucleus to the size of a pin, it would have a tremendous impact on the laws of physics and the structure of matter. It would also greatly alter the fundamental forces that govern the behavior of particles and atoms.

## 3. Is it possible to manipulate the size of the nucleus?

Currently, there is no known method to manipulate the size of the nucleus. The size of the nucleus is determined by the number of protons and neutrons it contains, and altering this number would result in a different element with different properties.

## 4. How is the size of the nucleus related to its functions?

The size of the nucleus is directly related to its functions. As the center of an atom, the nucleus contains the majority of its mass and determines its chemical and physical properties. The size of the nucleus also affects how it interacts with other particles and atoms.

## 5. Are there any ongoing research or experiments on scaling up the nucleus?

At the moment, there are no active research or experiments on scaling up the nucleus to the size of a pin. However, scientists continue to study the nucleus and its properties to better understand the fundamental building blocks of matter and potentially discover new ways to manipulate it in the future.

• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
686
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
37K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
9K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
6K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
4K