Scattering of X-rays and polarization

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the scattering of X-rays and their polarization characteristics, particularly focusing on the conditions under which X-rays scattered perpendicularly to the incident direction become linearly polarized. The context includes classical electromagnetism, various scattering mechanisms, and applications in X-ray optics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls that X-rays scattered perpendicularly to the incident direction are linearly polarized, questioning whether this holds true for low energy X-rays only or also for higher energies involving Compton scattering.
  • Another participant notes that the classical polarization dependence is valid for Thomson scattering and mentions other scattering effects like multiple scattering and magnetic scattering, which exhibit different polarization behaviors.
  • A participant introduces the Brewster Angle, suggesting its relevance to X-ray reflection at metal surfaces and its application in X-ray telescopes.
  • Another participant clarifies that while total external reflection is used in X-ray optics, it is not an efficient method for controlling polarization, highlighting the limitations of the angles involved.
  • This participant also discusses the use of Bragg reflections for achieving better polarization purity, noting the trade-off between energy band width and the effectiveness of Bragg optics compared to mirrors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the polarization characteristics of X-rays under various scattering conditions, with no consensus reached on the implications of Compton scattering or the efficiency of different optical methods for polarization control.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific scattering mechanisms and their polarization effects, but does not resolve the uncertainties regarding the applicability of these effects across different energy ranges or the efficiency of various optical techniques.

Gruxg
Messages
43
Reaction score
2
I read once (I don't remember exactly where) that X-rays scattered perpendicularly to the direction of the incident X-rays are linearly polarized (even although the incident ones are not). I think the discussion was in the context of low energy X-rays, and the explanation used classical electromagnetism arguments: it was the same as the polarization by scattering mentioned here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/polar.html

Is it true only for very low energy X-rays (with Rayleigh or Thompson scattering, i.e, frequency of the scattering = frequency of incident radiation), or is it true also for higher energies where the scattering is mainly by Compton effect?
 
Science news on Phys.org
This was discovered by Charles Barkla in 1905 (the paper is from 1906).

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1917/barkla-bio.html

The classical polarization dependence holds for Thomson scattering. There are other effects such as multiple scattering, magnetic scattering, and resonant scattering that have different polarization behavior.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01630-3I am not sure about Compton scattering. There are polarization effects that have been used for experiments, in particular to study magnetism

http://geant4.cern.ch/G4UsersDocuments/UsersGuides/PhysicsReferenceManual/html/node56.html
 
Isn't the Brewster Angle involved in this? At large angles of incidence, you get reflection of X Rays at metal surface. It's how X Ray telescopes work.
 
Total external reflection of x-rays is indeed used for x-ray optics (terrestrial and astro). However, it is not an efficient way to control or modify polarization.

The angles up to which you get total external reflection of x-rays is typically very small. e.g. for a Gold surface and 12.4 keV x-rays (1 Angstrom wave length), the cut-off angle is 0.351 deg.

http://www.x-ray-optics.de/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=64&lang=en

The large angles close to 90deg you get by using Bragg reflections, choosing a crystal and Bragg reflection that have the correct d-spacing (or choosing the wave length to match the crystal). With this you can get excellent polarization purity.

http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.254801

The obvious disadvantage of Bragg-based optics compared to mirrors is that Bragg optics only work for a very narrow energy band, whereas mirrors can work for a wide range of energies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K