Schrodinger's Cat, Structures and the Observer Effect

AI Thread Summary
Schrodinger's cat illustrates the complexities of quantum mechanics, but it does not relate to measuring stresses and strains in structures. Stresses and strains are directional and depend on the orientation of strain gauges, which is a separate concept from the observer effect. The observer effect in classical physics indicates that measurement alters the system slightly, while in quantum mechanics, it involves more intricate interactions. There is no established connection between macro systems, like structural measurements, and the micro systems of quantum mechanics regarding the observer. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate interpretations in both fields.
marellasunny
Messages
245
Reaction score
3
I am not a theoretical physicist but I have heard of Schrodinger's cat. It is a fact that stresses and strains measured along a structure are directional i.e the stresses and strains vary according to the direction you orient your strain gauge in. Does this have any connection with the 'observer effect' I read so often in blogs.Has there been any relation established between such a macro and micro system? i.e where the observer is considered part of the system.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No, the observer effect has no relation to the way you measure strain and stress. The observer effect, in classical physics, simply means that you must interact and change a system a small amount if you want to measure something. In Quantum Mechanics the idea is much more complicated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top