The Schwarzchild metric has a spacelike singularity, while the R-N metric has a timelike one. The difference between the two physical systems is charge. Obviously you've a very slightly charged black hole, the SC metric is a good approximation because Q/M is too small to really be worried about.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); However, the change from spacelike to timelike (and vice versa) singularities is not a continous one, it's a discrete one.

The discrete nature of the singularity seems to be a fundamental difference (particularly when you're drawing Penrose diagrams, the staple diagram of my black hole course ATM) so I'm having a bit of trouble getting my head around how you could have a good approximation using the SC metric. It seems to me the nature of the singularity isn't a good approximation for that particular part of the system?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Schwarzchild and Reissner-Nordstrom singularities

Loading...

Similar Threads for Schwarzchild Reissner Nordstrom | Date |
---|---|

A Four velocity with the Schwarzchild metric | Mar 16, 2017 |

A Light from the singularity of a charged black hole | Jan 21, 2017 |

B Schwarzschild radius | Nov 25, 2016 |

B Schwarzschild Metric | Jul 17, 2016 |

I Exterior Schwarzchild Solution/Gravitational Time Dilation | Jun 30, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**