Schwarzschild spacetime proper time to fall radially inward

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating proper time in Schwarzschild spacetime when falling radially inward. The method involves setting specific values for the radial coordinate, R and 2GM, and integrating proper time over these values. However, the consensus is that direct substitution of the parameterization into the proper time equation is sufficient due to the invariance of the Lagrangian under reparameterization. Integration is unnecessary in this context as the parameterization already provides the required information.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schwarzschild spacetime and its properties
  • Familiarity with proper time calculations in general relativity
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics and its invariance under reparameterization
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of proper time in Schwarzschild spacetime
  • Learn about geodesics in general relativity and their significance
  • Explore Lagrangian mechanics and its applications in physics
  • Investigate the implications of reparameterization invariance in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical aspects of spacetime and proper time calculations.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Question attached

illbeyourmassiveparticle.png


My method was going to be:

set ##r=R## and solve for ##n(R)##
set ##r=2GM## and solve for ##n(2GM)##

I was then going to integrate proper time ##s## over these values of ##r##:
##\int\limits^{n=cos^{-1}(\frac{4GM}{R}-1)}_{n=cos^{-1}(1)=0} s(n) dn ###

whereas the solution, all you have to do is plug in these values ##n(r)## and ##n(2GM)## into ##s=s(n)##, equation (2).

Is it wrong to integrate or would I get the same answer?

Is the reason that you can plug in and don't need to integrate due to the fact that the lagrangian, is invariant under reparameterisation, or does it have nothing to do with this??:

i.e:
##s=\sqrt{L}=\sqrt{g_{uv}\frac{dx^u}{dn}\frac{dx^v}{dn}} dn##, ##n## the parameter

Homework Equations



see above

The Attempt at a Solution



see above[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's simpler than that. You are given a parameterisation for ##s## in terms of ##\eta##. So, if you know the start and end values of ##\eta##, you can plug these in and get the start and end proper times.

If you were given ##ds##, then you would have to integrate that to get ##s(\eta)##, but that has already been done for you.

There's no more to it than that.

Re the metric, the fact that the parameterisation represents a geodesic is all you need to know (although even that doesn't really matter). You might want to check that it's a valid geodesic, but it looks like the question is giving you that as well.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
756
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
6K