- #1
TheOneRaven
- 3
- 0
Good afternoon everyone,
I'm not sure where to post this, or if it is worth your wild to answer such an inquiry. I am not into the physics & quantum mechanics formulas and being able to figure them out as many of you, however I am finding myself requiring some assistance in the field of Schwarzschild's radius. I am a member of Space.com where we discuss many of the new discoveries, and other scientific topics. Recently a member has visited our site with an open contradiction to the interpretation of Schwarzschild's radius and how it's been misused by astrophysicists over the last 90 years. Laying insult to names such as Hawking, Penrose, and Chandrasekhar. Below I have included a post this individual has made indicating apparent evidence to prove black holes don't exist. Of course I dismiss his claims. However, is there any formula to indicate the contrary and lay this argument to rest? If you can help, it would very much be appreciated.
Many of us believe this noblackhole individual to be Mr. Crothers as his attitude, choices or words, etc... all seem to match that of Mr. Crothers from these links. Thank you, again.
I'm not sure where to post this, or if it is worth your wild to answer such an inquiry. I am not into the physics & quantum mechanics formulas and being able to figure them out as many of you, however I am finding myself requiring some assistance in the field of Schwarzschild's radius. I am a member of Space.com where we discuss many of the new discoveries, and other scientific topics. Recently a member has visited our site with an open contradiction to the interpretation of Schwarzschild's radius and how it's been misused by astrophysicists over the last 90 years. Laying insult to names such as Hawking, Penrose, and Chandrasekhar. Below I have included a post this individual has made indicating apparent evidence to prove black holes don't exist. Of course I dismiss his claims. However, is there any formula to indicate the contrary and lay this argument to rest? If you can help, it would very much be appreciated.
noblackhole said:by noblackhole » Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:15 am
Claims have been made here that Antoci, Abrams and Crothers have been proven wrong by relativists that have more knowledge of mathematics than does the claimant, and the claimant seems to agree with his unnamed and unreferenced relativists. But not knowing enough mathematics by his admission, one wonders how that claimant can make a judgment at all.
There are also claims made here that K. Schwarzschild is responsible for the black hole and that he drew various conclusions for them, etc. etc. These claims are patently false. In fact, the so-called "Schwarzschild solution" is not even Schwarzschild's solution. Schwarzschild's actual solution precludes the notion of a black hole. Schwarzschild did not breathe a single word about the black hole, and not by any other name either. This is easily verified by reading Schwarzschild's actual paper, which can be obtained here:
http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/schwarzschild.pdf
Most who talk of black holes and Karl Schwarzschild have never even seen his actual paper and don't even know his actual solution, instead taking for granted what they are told by other people who have never read Schwarzschild's actual paper, and accept all the demonstrable falsehoods that have been attributed to Schwarzschild by the very same people who have never seen Schwarzschild's actual paper and no not of his solution.
Here also is a recent paper that explains the facts in full:
http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/DPS-paper.pdf
Any discussion about black holes must first be based upon the facts, not the authority of people who do not know the facts, but pretend that they do, no matter how adept those 'authorities' might be at index raising and lowering.
Many of us believe this noblackhole individual to be Mr. Crothers as his attitude, choices or words, etc... all seem to match that of Mr. Crothers from these links. Thank you, again.