Science Humor: A Wide Selection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Humor Science
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a variety of science-related humor, showcasing anecdotes, jokes, and humorous theories. A notable story involves a NASA team during the Apollo mission who encountered a Navajo sheep herder, leading to a humorous mistranslation of a message intended for the moon. Another highlight is Chuck Yeager's playful exaggeration about a design flaw in the Bell X-1 aircraft, which he humorously attributed to complex aerodynamics rather than a simple cable routing issue. The thread also features the "Dark Sucker Theory," humorously positing that light bulbs "suck dark" instead of emitting light, and a fictitious element called "administratium," which humorously critiques bureaucracy in science. Various jokes illustrate the intersection of humor and science, such as the classic question about the nature of hell, which leads to a clever thermodynamic analysis. Overall, the content blends clever scientific concepts with humor, appealing to those with an interest in both science and comedy.
  • #301
Technological One-Upmanship
After digging to a depth of 1000 feet last year, Scottish scientists found traces of copper wire dating back 1000 years, and came to the conclusion that their ancestors already had a telephone network a thousand years ago.

Not to be outdone, in the weeks that followed, English scientists dug 2000 feet and headlines in the U.K. Papers read: "English scientists have found traces of 2000 year old optical fibre, and have concluded that our ancestors already had an advanced high-tech digital network a thousand years earlier than the Scots."

One week later, the Irish newspapers reported the following: "After digging as deep as 5000 feet, Irish scientists have found absolutely nothing. They have concluded that 5000 years ago, our ancestors were already using wireless technology."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #302
The Pizza Theorem

The volume of a pizza can be found by the following method. Let z equal the radius of the pizza and let \alpha equal the thickness of the pizza. The volume can be found by multiplying the area of the top of the pizza by the thickness of the pizza. The area of the top of the pizza is equal to Pi times the radius squared (the radius times itself).

Or, the final equation:

V=Pi z z \alpha
 
  • Like
Likes SpanishOmelette
  • #303
Back in the late sixties/ early seventies, after it was discovered that the outer planets would soon all be in the same general area of space at the same time - an event that happens once every 175 years, and what made the Voyager missions possible - the director of NASA declared: "The last time this happened Jefferson was President, and he blew it!"
 
Last edited:
  • #304
Hey, this really IS funny. Have you ever looked in on a class of freshman physics students taking a test on vectors and cross products?

All of the contortions remind me of interpretive dance.
 
  • #305
didnt read the entire thread but I ran a thread search and this one has not come up yet:


Pretty Little Polynomial and Curly Pi​
Once upon a time (1/t) pretty little Polly Nomial was strolling across a field of vectors when she came to the boundary of a singularly large matrix. Now Polly was convergent, and her mother had made it an absolute condition that she must never, ever enter such an array without her brackets on. Polly, however, who had changed her variables that morning and was feeling particularly badly behaved, ignored this condition on the basis that it was insufficient, and made her way in amongst the complex elements.

Rows and columns closed in on her from all sides. Tangents approached her surface, and she became tenser and tenser. Quite suddenly, two branches of a hyperbola touched her at a single point. She oscillated violently, became unstable, lost all sense of directrix, tripped over a square root that was protruding from the erf, and plunged headlong down a steep gradient. She was completely divergent by the time she reached the turning point. When she rounded off once more, she found herself inverted, apparently alone in a non-euclidean space.

She was being watched, however. That smooth operator, Curly Pi, was lurking inner product. As his eyes devoured her curvilinear coordinates, a singular expression crossed his face. He wondered, was she convergent? He decided to integrate improperly at once.

Hearing a common fraction behind her, Polly rotated and saw Curly Pi approaching with his lower series extended. She could see at once his degenerate conic and his dissipative terms, and knew he was irrational. "Arcsinh!" she gasped.

"Hey, what's your sine?" he asked. "What a symmetric set of asymptotes you have!"

"Stay away from me!" she protested. "I haven't got any brackets on!"

"Calm yourself, my dear!" said the smooth operator.. "Your fears are purely imaginary."

"i, i, ..." she thought, "Perhaps he's not normal, but homologous."

"What order are you?" the brute suddenly demanded.

"Seventeen," replied Polly.

Curly leered, "I suppose you've never been operated upon?"

"Of course not. I'm absolutely convergent!" Polly replied quite properly.

"Come on," said Curly: "Let's go to decimal place I know of, and I'll take you to the limit."

"Never!" gasped Polly..

"Abscissa!" he swore a violent oath. Coshing her over the coefficient with a log until she was powerless, Curly removed her discontinuities. He stared at her significant places, and began smoothing her points of inflection. Poor Polly Nomial! The algorithm method was now her only hope. She felt him approaching her asymptotic limit. Her convergence would soon be gone forever. There was no mercy; Curly was a heavy side operator. His radius squared itself and Polly's loci quivered. He integrated by parts. He integrated by partial fractions. After he cofactored, he performed Runge-Kutta on her. He even went all the way around and did a contour integration. Curly went on operating until he satisfied her hypotheses, then he exponentiated and became completely orthogonal.

When Polly got home that night, her mother noticed that she was no longer piecewise continuous, but had been truncated in several places. But it was too late to differentiate now. As the months went by, Polly's denominator increased monotonically. Finally, they took her to L'Hopital and generated a small but pathological function which left surds all over the place and drove Polly to deviation.

The moral of this tale is: "If you want to keep your expressions convergent, never allow them a single degree of freedom."

Now that's what I call getting your Mathematical Pundamentals right.

http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~pjbk/humour/polynomial.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #306
Not a science joke, but I like it:

Based on what you know about him in history books, what do you think Abraham Lincoln would be doing if he were alive today?
1. Writing his memoirs of the Civil War.
2. Advising the President.
3. Desperately clawing at the inside of his coffin.
-- David Letterman
 
  • #307
Again, not science...well, maybe psychology?

A husband walks into the bedroom holding two aspirin and a glass of water. His wife asks, "What's that for?"

"It's for your headache."

"I don't have a headache."

He replies, "Gotcha!"
 
  • Like
Likes CynicusRex
  • #308
Answer on a blonde's geometry test

------------------
 

Attachments

  • blonde-joke.jpg
    blonde-joke.jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 539
  • Like
Likes SpanishOmelette
  • #309
That looks like one of my tests.
 
  • #310
Atomos said:
"Calm yourself, my dear!" said the smooth operator.. "Your fears are purely imaginary."

"i, i, ..." she thought, "Perhaps he's not normal, but homologous."

"What order are you?" the brute suddenly demanded.

"Seventeen," replied Polly.

Curly leered, "I suppose you've never been operated upon?"

"Of course not. I'm absolutely convergent!" Polly replied quite properly.

"Come on," said Curly: "Let's go to decimal place I know of, and I'll take you to the limit."

"Never!" gasped Polly..

"Abscissa!" he swore a violent oath. Coshing her over the coefficient with a log until she was powerless, Curly removed her discontinuities. He stared at her significant places, and began smoothing her points of inflection. Poor Polly Nomial! The algorithm method was now her only hope. She felt him approaching her asymptotic limit. Her convergence would soon be gone forever. There was no mercy; Curly was a heavy side operator. His radius squared itself and Polly's loci quivered. He integrated by parts. He integrated by partial fractions. After he cofactored, he performed Runge-Kutta on her. He even went all the way around and did a contour integration. Curly went on operating until he satisfied her hypotheses, then he exponentiated and became completely orthogonal.

When Polly got home that night, her mother noticed that she was no longer piecewise continuous, but had been truncated in several places. But it was too late to differentiate now. As the months went by, Polly's denominator increased monotonically. Finally, they took her to L'Hopital and generated a small but pathological function which left surds all over the place and drove Polly to deviation.

The moral of this tale is: "If you want to keep your expressions convergent, never allow them a single degree of freedom."
:smile: But the poor little girl got raped. :bugeye: :cry:

If you put it on in code its just fine.
 
  • #311
topsquark said:
Again, not science...well, maybe psychology?

A husband walks into the bedroom holding two aspirin and a glass of water. His wife asks, "What's that for?"

"It's for your headache."

"I don't have a headache."

He replies, "Gotcha!"

That took way too long for me to get.
 
  • #312
very bad joke from my maths teacher

intergrate __1__ d cabin
cabin


edit. ok so that didn't work. must learn to use latex. the cabin should be under the 1.
 
  • #313
Alkatran said:
That took way too long for me to get.

I still don't get that joke.
 
  • #314
eax said:
I still don't get that joke.
someone explain
 
  • #315
physicsuser said:
someone explain


Explain what? The joke or why eax doesn`t 'get it' ??!?
 
  • #316
zanazzi78 said:
Explain what? The joke or why eax doesn`t 'get it' ??!?
Do the chickens have large talons?
 
  • #317
eax said:
I still don't get that joke.
eax:

Q: What is the #1 reason women use to get out of having sex?
A: They have a headache.
 
  • Like
Likes SpanishOmelette
  • #318
Ah yeah lol. Now the joke makes sense.
 
  • #319
Q: How many Microsoft technicians does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Three. Two to hold the ladder and one to hammer the bulb into a faucet.

-Dan
 
  • #320
An Oxford philosopher was giving a lecture on the philosophy of language at Columbia University, and came to a curious aspect of the English language. "You will note," said the stuffy Oxford scholar, "that in the English language, two negatives can mean a positive, but never is it the case that two positives can mean a negative." To which someone in the back responded, "yeah, yeah."


-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes CynicusRex
  • #321
Researchers in Fairbanks Alaska announced last week that they have discovered a superconductor which will operate at room temperature.

-Dan
 
  • Haha
Likes Demystifier
  • #322
SCIENCE: BREAD IS DANGEROUS

1. More than 98 percent of convicted felons are bread users.

2. Fully HALF of all children who grow up in bread-consuming households score below average on standardized tests.

3. In the 18th century, when virtually all bread was baked in the home, the average life expectancy was less than 50 years; infant mortality rates were unacceptably high; many women died in childbirth; and diseases such as typhoid, yellow fever, and influenza ravaged whole nations.

4. More than 90 percent of violent crimes are committed within 24 hours of eating bread.

5. Bread has been proven to be addictive. Subjects deprived of bread and given only water to eat, begged for bread after as little as two days.

6. Bread is often a "gateway" food item, leading the user to "harder" items such as butter, jelly, peanut butter, and even cream cheese.

7. Bread has been proven to absorb water. Since the human body is more than 90 percent water, it follows that eating bread could lead to your body being taken over by this absorptive food product, turning you into a soggy, gooey, bread-pudding person.

8. Newborn babies can choke on bread.

9. Bread is baked at temperatures as high as 450 degrees Fahrenheit! That kind of heat can kill an adult in less than two minutes.

10. Most American bread eaters are utterly unable to distinguish between significant scientific fact and meaningless statistical babbling.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes SpanishOmelette
  • #323
A pessimist, and optimist, and an engineer were having breakfast together. They all had their glasses half full of whatever they were drinking when they stopped to look at them.
The pessimist says, "My glass is half empty."
The optimist says, "My glass is half full."
The engineer says, "What moron made this glass? It has twice the mass required to hold the fluid!"


-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes SpanishOmelette
  • #324
the twisted logic of my french teacher:

'who agrees with sarah?'
'who doesn't?'
'who can't be bothered to put their hand up?'

worryingly, i was the only one who saw the flaw.
 
  • #325
QueenFisher said:
the twisted logic of my french teacher:

'who agrees with sarah?'
'who doesn't?'
'who can't be bothered to put their hand up?'

worryingly, i was the only one who saw the flaw.

You know I once asked my 7 AM class to put their hands up if they were sleeping. Only two students raised their hands!

-Dan
 
  • #326
A physicist, an engineer, a mathematician, and an accountant attend an interview for a job.

Interviewer: What's 2+2?
Phy: It's 4 +/- 0.001.

Int: What's 2+2?
Eng: It's 3.99 to a good approximation.

Int: What's 2+2?
Math: I have no idea what 2+2 is, but I do know that a solution exists.

Int: What's 2+2?
Acc: *Looks around to make sure that no one's listening and says* What do you want it to be? :wink:
 
  • #327
Ivan Seeking said:
Hey, this really IS funny. Have you ever looked in on a class of freshman physics students taking a test on vectors and cross products?

All of the contortions remind me of interpretive dance.
I haven't read this thread in a while! I used to get the biggest kick out of peeking in the door during physics exams and watching them all trying to use the right-hand rule...and looking for the one student in the room who is using their left hand to do it! :smile: (There's always at least one.)
 
  • #328
Understanding Engineers
A priest, a doctor and an engineer were waiting one morning for a particularly slow group of golfers.
The engineer fumed, "What's with those guys? We've been waiting 15 minutes!"
The doctor chimed in, "I don't know, but I've never seen such inept golfers!"
The priest said, "Here comes the greens keeper, let's ask him."
He said, "Hello, George! What's wrong with the group ahead of us? They're rather slow aren't they?"
The greens keeper replied, "Oh, yes. That's a group of blind fire fighters.
They lost their sight saving our clubhouse from a fire last year, so we always let them play for free anytime."
The group fell silent for a moment.
The priest said, 'That's so sad. I think I will say a special prayer for them tonight."
The doctor said, "Good idea. I'm going to contact my ophthalmologist colleague and see if there's anything he can do for them."

The engineer said, "Why can't they play at night?"
 
  • #329
Here's a one-liner...

String Theory

:biggrin: :wink:
 
  • #330
The following is supposedly an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid-term exam. The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well.

Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.

One student, however, wrote the following:

First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.

As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell.

Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.

This gives two possibilities:

1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.

2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.


So which is it?

If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, "it will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you, and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number 2 must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The porollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct...leaving only Heaven thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my God."

THIS STUDENT RECEIVED THE ONLY "A"
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes CynicusRex and SpanishOmelette
  • #331
Not exactly a joke, but I found it funny... especially considering I'm terrible at maths. In fact, this picture gives me some ideas for the next time I'm asked a question like this :-p .

examq6.jpg
 
  • #332
Geographer said:
Not exactly a joke, but I found it funny... especially considering I'm terrible at maths. In fact, this picture gives me some ideas for the next time I'm asked a question like this :-p .

examq6.jpg

:smile: :smile: :smile:

That one caught me off gaurd.

Okay, I've been playing with Linux and the Bash - Bourne again shell. :smile: :smile: :smile: That's funny!
 
Last edited:
  • #333
Geographer said:
Not exactly a joke, but I found it funny... especially considering I'm terrible at maths. In fact, this picture gives me some ideas for the next time I'm asked a question like this :-p .

examq6.jpg


lol that's so great. I would have been like here it is. oh and X tells me the answer is 5cm. and never do that pythagorium theorum work.

oh and ill be nice and give you a picture to.

http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1811/auto0ua.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #334
The clothes are in the way :D
 
  • #335
From somewhere at UMass/Lowell

THE LAST WORD - The Ultimate Scientific Dictionary :rolleyes:

Activation Energy: The useful quantity of energy available in one cup of coffee.

Atomic Theory: mythological explanation of the nature of matter, first proposed by the ancient Greeks, and now thoroughly discredited by modern computer simulation. Attempts to verify the theory by modern computer simulation have failed. Instead, it has been demonstrated repeatedly that computer outputs depend upon the color of the programmer's eyes, or occasionally upon the month of his or her birth. This apparent astrological connection, at last, vindicates the alchemist's view of astrology as the mother of all science.

Bacon, Roger: An English friar who dabbled in science and made experimentation fashionable. Bacon was the first science popularizer to make it big on the banquet and talk-show circuit, and his books even outsold the fad diets of the period.

Bunsen Burner: device invented by Robert Bunsen (1811-1899) for brewing tea or coffee in the laboratory, thereby enabling the chemist to be poisoned without having to go all the way to the company cafeteria.

Butyl: An unpleasant-sounding word denoting an unpleasant - smelling alcohol.

CAI: Acronym for "Computer-Aided Instruction". The modern system of training professional scientists without ever exposing them to the hazards and expense of laboratory work. Graduates of CAI-based programs are very good at simulated research.

Cavendish: variety of pipe tobacco that is reputed to produce remarkably clear thought processes, and thereby leads to major scientific discoveries; hence, the name of a British research laboratory where the tobacco is smoked in abundance.

Chemical: substance that:
1) An organic chemist turns into a foul odor;
2) an analytical chemist turns into a procedure;
3) a physical chemist turns into a straight line;
4) a biochemist turns into a helix;
5) a chemical engineer turns into a profit.

Chemical Engineering: The practice of doing for a profit what an organic chemist only does for fun.

Chromatography: (From Gr. chromo [color] + graphos [writing]) The practice of submitting manuscripts for publication with the original figures drawn in non-reproducing blue ink.

Clinical Testing: The use of humans as guinea pigs. (See also PHARMACOLOGY and TOXICOLOGY)

Compound: To make worse, as in:
1) fracture;
2) the mutual adulteration of two or more elements.

Computer Resources: The major item of any budget, allowing for the acquisition of any capital equipment that is obsolete before the purchase request is released.

Eigen Function: The use to which an eigen is put.

En: The universal bidentate ligand used by coordination chemists. For years, efforts were made to use ethylene diamine for this purpose, but chemists were unable to squeeze all the letters between the corners of the octahedron diagram. The timely invention of en in 1947 revolutionized the science.

Evaporation Allowance: The volume of alcohol that the graduate students can drink in a year's time.

Exhaustive Methylation: A marathon event in which the participants methylate until they drop from exhaustion.

First Order Reaction: The reaction that occurs first, not always the one desired. For example, the formation of brown gunk in an organic prep.

Flame Test: Trial by fire.

Genetic Engineering: recent attempt to formalize what engineers have been doing informally all along.

Grignard: fictitious class of compounds often found on organic exams and never in real life.

Inorganic Chemistry: That which is left over after the organic, analytical, and physical chemists get through picking over the periodic table.

Mercury: (From L. Mercurius, the swift messenger of the gods) Element No. 80, so named because of the speed of which one of its compounds (calomel, Hg2Cl2) goes through the human digestive tract. The element is perhaps misnamed, because the gods probably would not be pleased by the physiological message so delivered.

Monomer: One mer. (Compare POLYMER).

Natural Product: substance that earns organic chemists fame and glory when they manage to systhesize it with great difficulty, while Nature gets no credit for making it with great ease.

Organic Chemistry: The practice of transmuting vile substances into publications.

Partition Function: The function of a partition is to protect the lab supervisor from shrapnel produced in laboratory explosions.

Pass/Fail: An attempt by professional educators to replace the traditional academic grading system with a binary one that can be handled by a large digital computer.

Pharmacology: The use of rabbits and dogs as guinea pigs. (See also CLINICAL TESTING, TOXICOLOGY).

Physical Chemistry: The pitiful attempt to apply y=mx+b to everything in the universe.

Pilot Plant: modest facility used for confirming design errors before they are built into a costly, full-scale production facility.

Polymer: Many mers. (Compare MONOMERS).

Prelims: (From L. pre [before] + limbo [oblivion]) An obligatory ritual practiced by graduate students just before the granting of a Ph.D. (if the gods are appeased) or an M.S. (if they aren't).

Publish or Perish: The imposed, involuntary choice between fame and oblivion, neither of which is handled gracefully by most faculty members.

Purple Passion: deadly libation prepared by mixing equal volumes of grape juice and lab alcohol.

Quantum Mechanics: crew kept on the payroll to repair quantums, which decay frequently to the ground state.

Rate Equations: (Verb phrase) To give a grade or a ranking to a formula based on its utility and applicability. H=E, for example, applies to everything everywhere, and therefore rates an A. pV=nRT, on the other hand, is good only for nonexistent gases and thus receives only a D+, but this grade can be changed to a B- if enough empirical virial coefficients are added.

Research: (Irregular noun) That which I do for the benefit of humanity, you do for the money, he does to hog all the glory.

Sagan: The international unit of humility.

Scientific Method: The widely held philosophy that a theory can never be proved, only disproved, and that all attempts to explain anything are therefore futile.

SI:Acronym for "Systeme Infernelle".

Spectrophotometry: long word used mainly to intimidate freshman nonmajors.

Spectroscope: disgusting-looking instrument used by medical specialists to probe and examine the spectrum.

Toxicology: The wholesale slaughter of white rats bred especially for that purpose. (See also CLINICAL TESTING, PHARMACOLOGY).

X-Ray Diffraction: An occupational disorder common among physicians, caused by reading X-ray pictures in darkened rooms for prolonged periods. The condition is readily cured by a greater reliance on blood chemistries; the lab results are just as inconclusive as the X-rays, but are easier to read.

Ytterbium: rare and inconsequential element, named after the village of Ytterby, Sweden (not to be confused with Iturbi, the late pianist and film personality, who was actually Spanish, not Swedish). Ytterbium is used mainly to fill block 70 in the periodic table. Iturbi was used mainly to play Jane Powell's father.

--
From the RHF archives as selected by Brad Templeton, Maddi Hausmann and Jim Griffith. This newsgroup posts former jokes from the newsgroup
rec.humor.funny. Visit http://www.netfunny.com/rhf to browse the RHF pages and archives on the web.
 
  • #336
What was the war between physicists in the early 20th century? The Bohr War
 
  • #337
Atomos, that was one bohring joke. God, I love science jokes. They amuse me. I think scientists need them once a day. They definitely need a lot of humor. They're too serious.
 
  • #338
Okay. I think here is one joke I really find amusing. To everyone, I hope you will all laugh.:confused:

What is matter? Never mind.
What is mind? No matter.

Hahahahaha! Human stupidity again! Have fun, everybody:biggrin:
 
  • #339
howtothinklikegod said:
Okay. I think here is one joke I really find amusing. To everyone, I hope you will all laugh.:confused:

What is matter? Never mind.
What is mind? No matter.

Hahahahaha! Human stupidity again! Have fun, everybody:biggrin:

Simpsons! .
 
  • #340
A Physicist, trying to excuse his lateness for dinner due to extracurricular activities calls his wife:

"Sorry honey, traffic is brutal. I've been stuck on the Amperian loop all day, and can't find the exit.."
 
  • #342
Useful Metric Conversions...
* 1 million microphones = 1 megaphone
* 2000 mockingbirds = two kilomockingbirds
* 10 cards = 1 decacards
* 1 millionth of a fish = 1 microfiche
* 453.6 graham crackers = 1 pound cake
* 1 trillion pins = 1 terrapin
* 10 rations = 1 decoration
* 10 millipedes = 1 centipede
* 3 1/3 tridents = 1 decadent
* 2 monograms = 1 diagram
* 2 wharves = 1 paradox
 
  • #343
matthyaouw said:
* 1 million microphones = 1 megaphone
Um, no, that would be a phone. :rolleyes:

* 2 wharves = 1 paradox
I thought it was two ducks.
 
  • #344
Silly physics jokes

Forum, what silly physics jokes do you know? Here's one:

Q: What did the photon say to the electron?

A: Nothing, it just waved!

ha-ha-ha-ha!:smile:
 
  • #345
A neutron walks into a bar and orders a beer. The barman pours the beer, gives it to the neutron and the neutron says "How much is that?". The barman says "For you, no charge."
 
  • #346
Finagle's Laws

http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mader/delta/deltoidslist/1998-06/msg00121.html

Law Of Experiment
-----------------

First Law --- If anything can go wrong with an experiment or test, it will.
Second Law -- Everything goes wrong at once.
Third Law --- Experiments must be reproducible. They should all fail in the same way.
Fourth Law -- Build no mechanism simply if a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful.
Fifth Law --- No hatter how an experiment or test proceeds, someone will believe it happened according to his pet theory.
Corollary One -- No matter what the result is, someone will misinterpret it.
Corollary Two -- No matter what results are anticipated, someone will be willing to fake them.

Law Of Mathematics
------------------

First Law --- In any collection of data, the figures that are obviously correct beyond all need of checking contain the errors.
Corollary One -- No one whom you ask for help will see the errors.
Corollary Two -- Everyone who stops by with unsought advice will see it immediately.
Second Law -- If,in any problem, you find yourself doing a transfinite amount of work, the answer can be obtained by inspection.
Corollary One -- If inspection fails to yield results, judicious application of one of the methods outlined in the text following may be in order.
(See Finagle's Constant)
 
  • #347
The Devil said to Daniel Webster: "Set me a task I can't carry out, and I'll give you anything in the world you ask for."
Daniel Webster: "Fair enough. Prove that for n greater than 2, the equation a^n + b^n = c^n has no non-trivial solution in the integers."
They agreed on a three-day period for the labor, and the Devil disappeared.
At the end of three days, the Devil presented himself, haggard, jumpy, biting his lip. Daniel Webster said to him, "Well, how did you do at my task? Did you prove the theorem?'
"Eh? No . . . no, I haven't proved it."
"Then I can have whatever I ask for? Money? The Presidency?'
"What? Oh, that—of course. But listen! If we could just prove the following two lemmas--"
----------------From Mathematical Magpie by Clifton Fadiman

It may not be funny anymore because FLT was already proven, and it's not a practical joke, but I found it really funny.
 
  • #348
Astronuc said:
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mader/delta/deltoidslist/1998-06/msg00121.html

You forgot Finagle's Theorem, the ultimate problem solving technique that solves any math problem in two steps.

1) Multiply by zero.
2) Add the right answer.
 
  • Haha
Likes CynicusRex
  • #349
franznietzsche said:
You forgot Finagle's Theorem, the ultimate problem solving technique that solves any math problem in two steps.

1) Multiply by zero.
2) Add the right answer.

I always thought the second step was look it up in the back of the textbook.
 
  • #350
Then there's always Fudd's first law of opposition:

If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.

Anybody who gets the reference to this may have a few issues..

:biggrin:
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
313
Replies
32
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top