Scientists reaching The End of Insight

  • Thread starter Thread starter mateomy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Insight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around skepticism regarding the claim that scientists are nearing "the end of insight," as presented in a referenced article. Participants express disbelief at the notion, arguing that such statements often emerge just before significant scientific breakthroughs that highlight the vast unknowns in science. Critics emphasize that the idea of computers replacing human scientists is misguided, suggesting that true intelligence requires a fundamentally different model than current computational methods. They argue that recent advancements may be overhyped, merely representing sophisticated data analysis tools rather than genuine problem-solving capabilities. The conversation reflects frustration with sensationalist journalism and a belief in the enduring necessity of human insight in scientific discovery.
Physics news on Phys.org


Zing!
 


In all seriousness though, is it not ridiculous to state that "scientists are nearing the end of insight." How would someone even be able to determine that? Ridiculous.
 


"scientists are nearing the end of insight."
Such claims usually pop up just before some great discovery that shows how little yet we know.
 


Journalists reaching the end of sanity.
 


This looks like a program which searches a 'symbolic space' for the most fitting mathematical formula. I doubt it can find any 'very hard' relation on a dataset. Probably, it may have applications in control theory where people now often mess around with simple PID controllers to solve about anything; it looks like a great tool for that.

For computer to bypass humans my best guess is you need a completely different model for intelligence, like copying the human brain in an abstract manner. This has little to do with that. It's a lot of fuzz about a nice program.
 


Even if we could start mass producing quantum computer tomorrow it'd still be awhile we could develop AI sophisticated enough to be true problem solvers. Perhaps we've reached the end of non-computer assisted insight?
 


wow, so they wrote yet another curve-fitting application, declared themselves geniuses, and told all their dumbfounded writer friends about it. I'm having trouble controlling my incite for these goobers.
 

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top