Second derivatives and inflection points

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter keroberous
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives Points
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of inflection points in relation to second derivatives, particularly focusing on the case of the function f(x) = x^4. Participants explore the conditions under which inflection points occur, the implications of second derivatives being zero, and the differences in behavior between various polynomial functions at their critical points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that an inflection point typically occurs when f''(x)=0, suggesting that this indicates a change in the slope of tangents.
  • Another participant argues that for an inflection point, the next derivative must also be non-zero to confirm a change in curvature, specifically referencing the function f(x) = x^4.
  • A participant questions why the second derivative is zero at x=0 for f(x) = x^4, despite the function being concave up at that point.
  • Concerns are raised about the differences in behavior between the local minimum of x^4 and that of a cubic polynomial, particularly regarding the sign of the second derivative.
  • One participant emphasizes that an inflection point is defined by a change in the sign of f''(x), and that f''(x)=0 does not necessarily indicate an inflection point if the sign does not change.
  • Another participant clarifies that the first non-zero derivative after the first must be odd for an inflection point to occur, while even derivatives indicate no change in curvature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions for inflection points and the implications of second derivatives being zero. There is no consensus on the reasoning behind the behavior of the second derivative at specific points in polynomial functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the nuances of polynomial behavior at critical points, including the role of higher-order derivatives and the continuity of the second derivative. The discussion highlights the complexity of determining inflection points based on derivative values alone.

keroberous
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Hi there. I'm having some trouble wrapping my head around some ideas of inflection points as they relate to the second derivative.

I know that an inflection point occurs when f''(x)=0 in most cases. This makes sense to me because at this inflection point the slopes of the tangent change from increasing to decreasing, so the rate of change of the changing slopes must be zero. This is the same reasoning why a turning point occurs when f'(x)=0 (the original function f changes from increasing to decreasing, or vice versa).

However, in some cases (like f(x)=x^4) it's possible for both the first and second derivatives to be zero at the same place and I'm not sure as to what the reasoning behind this is. In this case, f'(0)=0 meaning there is a turning point here, but f''(0)=0 also but this is not an inflection point. It makes sense that there shouldn't be an inflection point at a turning point, but then why is the second derivative zero? In this case as x increases, the slope of the tangent is always increasing, so by that logic shouldn't the second derivative never equal zero?

Thanks for any help here!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In order to ...
keroberous said:
at this inflection point the slopes of the tangent change from increasing to decreasing
... you also need the next derivative to make sure there is a change. Otherwise, it could go from increasing to zero and back to increase. The next derivative (unequal zero) fixes the change. This, however, is not the case for ##x\longmapsto x^4.##

The second derivative is the curvature. You need the third (unequal zero) to have a change in curvature. Otherwise, it goes from e.g. left-handed to zero and back to left-handed.
 
Thanks for your answer. I'm still not clear as to why exactly the second derivative at zero for x^4 should be zero. The function is clearly concave up at this point (isn't it) so should it not be a positive second derivative?

Also, I'm not quite sure what the difference is in the changing tangents at the minimum value of x^4 compared to the local minimum of a cubic polynomial, for example. In both cases, the slope of the tangent is increasing (from negative slopes to positive slopes) as you move through this minimum point, but why is the second derivative of this point in the cubic positive where the second derivative at this point in x^4 is zero?
 
The functions ##x\longmapsto x^n## are especially flat at ##x=0.## Look at the plots on e.g. WolframAlpha:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y=x^21

\begin{align*}
x\longmapsto x^2\, &: \,\text{horizontal tangent, curvature positive}\\
x\longmapsto x^3\, &: \,\text{horizontal tangent, zero curvature, curvature change}\\
x\longmapsto x^4\, &: \,\text{horizontal tangent, zero curvature, no curvature change, jerk positive}\\
x\longmapsto x^5\, &: \,\text{horizontal tangent, zero curvature, no curvature change, no jerk change}\\
\ldots &\ldots
\end{align*}

Here is a nice picture in case ##f(x)## describes a physical motion of a body:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_(physics)

248px-Simple_position_derivatives_down_alt.svg.png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, 2milehi, Ssnow and 1 other person
I think focusing on the zeros for intuition is where you're getting tripped up.

An inflection point is where the sign of f''(x) changes. If f'' is continuous, it must change where f''(x)=0. But there are plenty of examples where f''(x)=0 and the sign of f'' doesn't change when you cross that value of x. So just knowing f''(x)=0 isn't enough to tell you it's an inflection point, it's just a good test to find the places that might be inflection points.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
fresh_42 said:
In order to ...

... you also need the next derivative to make sure there is a change. Otherwise, it could go from increasing to zero and back to increase. The next derivative (unequal zero) fixes the change. This, however, is not the case for ##x\longmapsto x^4.##

The second derivative is the curvature. You need the third (unequal zero) to have a change in curvature. Otherwise, it goes from e.g. left-handed to zero and back to left-handed.
No. You need the first nonzero derivative after first to be odd. Might be third derivative, might be fifth derivative or fifteenth. All of these are inflection points.
If first nonzero derivative after first is even, whether fourth, sixth et cetera, the curvature has the same sign both sides.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K